Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Answer: First option.
Step-by-step explanation:
You can idenfity in the figure that 
is formed by two secants that intersect outside of the given circle.
It is important to remember that, by definition:
Knowing this, you can set up the following equation:
Therefore, you must substitute values into the equation and then evaluate, in order to find the measure of the angle .
This is:
"To solve this problem, the formula can be used
I = P / T
Where I is the fraction of the sample
P is the amount of the sample
T is the total amount of sample
Since P = 252 chicken sandwiches and I = 0.55
And solve for T
T = 252 / 0.52
T = 458 sandwiches in total"
hope this helps
Answer:
Im sorry but there’s nothing on the pic
Explanation: try reposting this question
