1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LuckyWell [14K]
3 years ago
14

Word choice, message, and ____ are three elements that can be affected by an author's point of view.

English
2 answers:
Fiesta28 [93]3 years ago
3 0
Word choice, message, and organization are three elements that can be affected by an author's point of view.

V125BC [204]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Organization.

Explanation:

As per the question, organization along with the word choice and message are demonstrated as the three elements that could be influenced by the point of view of the author. The author's point of view or perspective through which he decides to relate the story determines the diction or word choice to be employed by the author in order to convey the message effectively. The message conveyed through a work and its organizational structure(the way in which the events of the narrative would be arranged) is also designed according to the point of view chosen by the author to relate the narrative to create the desired impact. Thus, <u>'organization'</u> is the correct answer.

You might be interested in
Are warmongers the greatest enemies for peace? What do you want to suggest to them? Please help me for this speech I'll make thi
Eduardwww [97]

Answer:

A little more than two years have passed since the first Information Meeting of the representatives of a number of Communist Parties was held.

The Declaration issued by this Meeting gave a profound analysis of changes which had taken place in the international situation as a result of World War Two and during the first postwar years. It revealed the formation of two camps in the world arena and the contrast of their aims and tasks; it exposed the aggressive plans of the imperialist camp headed by the U.S.—plans aimed at establishing world domination of Anglo-American imperialism and destroying democracy; it laid bare the treacherous role of the chieftains of Right-Wing Social Democracy as accomplices of imperialism in all its anti-popular activities.

The entire course of events for the past two years has fully confirmed the correctness of the estimation of the international situation given by the first Meeting of the Information Bureau, and of the perspectives and tasks of the anti-imperialist camp as outlined by that Meeting.

Estimating the significance of the decisions passed by the first Meeting of the Information Bureau, and also of the Resolution concerning the “Situation in the Communist Party of Yugoslavia” passed by the second Meeting of the Information Bureau, it can be boldly said today that these decisions are really historical decisions; that they played an outstanding role in mobilizing, organizing and consolidating the ranks of the international working-class movement; in mobilizing the masses to rebuff world reaction and the instigators of a new war; in further increasing and strengthening the forces of democracy and Socialism throughout the world.

During the period that has elapsed since the first Meeting of the Information Bureau, considerable changes have taken place in the international situation.

I.  CONSPIRACY OF THE AGGRESSORS AGAINST THE PEACE AND SECURITY OF THE PEOPLES

For the past two years, two lines in world policy have become even more clear and sharp—the line of the democratic, anti-imperialist camp headed by the U.S.S.R.—the camp waging a persistent and consistent struggle against imperialist reaction, for peace between peoples and for democracy, and the line of the imperialist, anti-democratic camp headed by the U.S.—the camp which has as its main object the enslavement of other countries and peoples, the forcible establishment of Anglo-American world domination, destruction of the forces of democracy and the unleashing of a new war. The struggle between these opposite camps has sharpened. The aggressive nature of the imperialist camp has further increased.

Whereas the first Meeting of the Information Bureau stated that the U.S. and Britain were going over to the policy of preparing new military adventures, at present the ruling circles of the United States and Britain heading the imperialist camp openly pursue the policy of aggression—the policy of preparing and unleashing a new world war.

Having taken the path of military-political conspiracy against peace and the security of the peoples, the ruling circles of the U.S. and Britain drive at full speed preparing a new war and are declaring with increasingly cynical shamelessness and insolence, their claims for world domination, the “American leadership of the world,” reviving the insane plans of German fascism and forgetting the historical lessons given to crazy pretenders for “world domination.”

The entire policy of the Anglo-American imperialist bloc serves the aim of preparing a new world war. It finds expression in the unrestrained economic, political and military expansion carried out by the U.S. on all continents in an attempt to seize military-strategic raw materials and other resources essential for war preparations. The U.S. imperialists are netting the entire globe with military, naval and air bases, and are preparing springboards for a new war. The support rendered by the Anglo-American imperialists to all outmoded reactionary regimes (the Franco Government in Spain, the monarcho-fascist Government in Greece, Chiang Kai-shek in China, and so on), to the remnants of the destroyed exploiting classes, spies, saboteurs and murderers in the People’s Democracies, to reactionary forces all over the world-all this serves the aim of preparing a new war. U.S. imperialism has become the center and mainstay of world reaction.

Imperialist circles of the U.S. and of Britain have openly trampled under foot the decisions of the Yalta and Potsdam Conferences, aimed at a just solution of the German problem and to transform Germany into a democratic peace-loving State. After pledging themselves to regard Germany as a single unit, they pursue a policy of splitting Germany, crowning this policy with the establishment of the puppet Bonn “Government.”

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Ralph stands up to Jack and the entire tribe after they steal piggy's glasses.
ankoles [38]
The characteristic that Ralph shows is his bravery as he is defending Piggy against such great numbers ( the entire tribe ).
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(1) The doctor told me to get more exercise. (2) Aside from that, she said that my health was great. (3) Since our family's trip
Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

Sentence 3 has a capitalization error since "Grand Canyon" is not capitalized

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Michael felt completely sad and completely alone. He had always counted on his grandfather for help and for guidance. Now, witho
True [87]

Answer:

either he died or he moved or he is in a coma

Explanation:

i need more backstory to go on but for now heres a couple answers

plz give brainliest

8 0
3 years ago
List at least THREE ways Macduff and Macbeth are the same. List at least THREE ways they are opposites. Explain your reasoning.
Anestetic [448]

Answer:

<u>Maduff and Macbeth</u>

<u>Similarities</u>

1. They are both vengeful.

Macbeth plots revenge for Macduff because he refuses to be loyal to him, and in the process, he murders his family.

Macduff after he learns of the brutal murder of his family, begins to plot his revenge against Macbeth.

2. They both have tunnel vision.

Macbeth is so singularly focused on becoming King that nothing else matters, he is blinded by the truth and believes the witches' prophecy implicitly.

Macduff is so blinded by his rage and quest for revenge against Macbeth that he is blinded to so many dangers.

3. They are both Lords of Scotland

Macduff and Macbeth are both Lords of Scotland. Macbeth is the honorable Thane of Glamis, Macduff is also a Thane of Fife.

<u>Differences</u>

1. Macduff is a loyal and honorable man, Macbeth is not.

Macduff is said to be a noble man that is loyal to Duncan and refuses to believe Macbeth's claim that Duncan was murdered by his servants.

Macbeth is no noble man and loyal to nobody unless he stands to gain something from it. He is also portrayed as power hungry and brutal

2. Macduff put his country and people first, Macbeth put himself and his interests first.

Macduff is described as a virtuous and honorable man who always puts his country and people first in whatever decision he wanted to take. He was a people pleaser.

Macbeth wanted to be wealthy and powerful and would do anything to get it, including murder. He always thought of himself first.

3. Macbeth was impatient, Macduff was not

In Macbeth's mad quest for power, he was very impatient and because of this he did not think things through before doing them. His impatience showed when he put a lot of faith in the prophecy of the witches and was desperate to be king.

Macduff by contrast was very patient and bade his time while plotting how to stop Macbeth from being King and also taking revenge.  

     

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is the closest antonym for the word function?
    12·2 answers
  • What word means a hobby or pastime pursued for pleasure?
    7·1 answer
  • Inspiring quote that i could use that actually makes sense
    5·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from the US Supreme court case Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these is a direct characterization of Ted from "My Brother's Keeper"?
    12·1 answer
  • Help me please..
    6·1 answer
  • Write a transforming-sources essay
    12·1 answer
  • Who are the children of blood and bone?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the verb of the following sentence? “Lance loves to eat fried Oreos on the boardwalk.”
    6·2 answers
  • I’m not 12 or I am not 12?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!