Answer:
Net income= $98,200
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Division A:
The contribution margin of $79,300
Division B:
Contribution margin of $126,200.
The total traceable fixed costs are $72,400 and total common fixed costs are $34,900.
<u>To calculate the net operating income, we need to deduct from the combined contribution margin the fixed costs.</u>
<u></u>
Net income= (79,300 + 126,200) - 72,400 - 34,900
Net income= $98,200
Answer:
The given condition is an example of:
A. Menu costs
Explanation:
In the given question mentioning data is that
Jake is been managing a grocery store in any country which is experiencing high rate of inflation. He is mentioned to be paid in cash.
On his very payday he went outside immediately and bought as many goods as he could for himself as he was going to get his pay today and was needing those items.
So, he thought of buying all the items he is needing as for the next two weeks in order of prevention of the money in his wallet from losing value due to high inflation rates.
And at last what he couldn't spend on buying for all that amount he converted that amount into most stable foreign currency for being used as a steep fee.
So all this were an example of :
A. Menu costs
Reverse logistics is the process by which businesses handle the return of consumer items for recycling or because they are defective.
Supply chain management that sends goods back from buyers to sellers or producers is known as reverse logistics. Reverse logistics are needed for procedures like returns or recycling after a customer receives a product. Reverse logistics begin at the customer and work their way backward through the supply chain to the producer or the distributor. Reverse logistics can also refer to procedures where the customer is in charge of the product's final disposal, such as recycling, refurbishing, or resale.
To learn more about Reverse Logistics here
brainly.com/question/15888400
#SPJ4
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
