Answer:
d. soft rationing
Explanation:
Soft rationing -
It is the process in which the company itselves takes the decision to limit the amount of capital , which is used for the investment for a given period of time , is known as soft rationing .
It is referred to as soft , as the decision is taken by the firm itself , where the changes and alteration all are done by the firm only according to the future goals and practices .
hence , from the question , the situation given , depicts - soft rationing .
Answer:
80,640 wafers
Explanation:
Calculation to determine How many wafers does the cooling tube hold on average when in production
Using this formula
I = R x T
Where,
R = 112 wafers per second x 60
R = 6720 wafers per minute
T = 12 minutes
Let compute for I using the formula aboi
I = 6720 x 12
I = 80,640 wafers
Therefore How many wafers does the cooling tube hold on average when in production are 80,640 wafers
Answer:
Answer is explained in the explanation section below.
Explanation:
Part A: In part a, we are required to show the effects on the financial statements using horizontal statements model.
For that, we need to tabulate the entries properly. So, it cannot be done be done here in the typing section. So, I m putting it into the attachments. Please refer to the attachment for the part a solution.
Part B:
Reason of the difference:
Cash revenue is $8650 but cash flow amount is $9600
Total operating expense incurred is $3350 but the amount paid only $2700
It will create $650 difference income statement and cash flow.
These activities are reasons for the differences between cash flow from the operating activity and net income.
Answer:
The agreement among the Jane and bank personally is the Guaranty
Explanation:
As Jane want to take a loan of $50 from bank in order to purchase a building but bank is worried regarding the financial health of the company so in order to grant the loan or mortgage, both bank and Jane entered into an agreement which states that the Jane would be personally liable for the payment if company defaults. So, the agreement in which they agreed is the guaranty given by Jane to bank.
As mentioned the alley was dark. So it is possible that there was someone else at the crime scene and the witness is mistaken to be that man. It is quite possible to see someone in the dark and mistaken them for someone else. As the alley was dark, eye witness testimony is not reliable.
The eyewitness doesn’t have any evidence whereas my client has an alibi and he was not present at the crime scene. Even if my client was standing near the boy it doesn’t prove that he killed someone.
