Answer:
In the nineteenth century, the United States sent troops into Latin America and South America.
Explanation:
After the Monroe Doctrine, there was a growing political thought in the United States that viewed South American countries as their 'Backyard'
Mexico, Brazil and even newly Independent countries of the time such as Chile and Venezuela were seen as improvised and underdeveloped.
The US political elites held racist views for these countries and assumed that they were poor simply because of an inferior race.
For the next 100 years, the United States would be heavily involved in these countries, either by going directly to war, supporting local rebels or even dictators.
During the French and Indian War, Native Americans sided with both England and France. Different tribes, and sometimes even individuals within the tribes, sided with different sides.
Among the advantages of siding with France was the fact that they were most tribes' main trading partner. As fur traders were often French, the French also had a stronger connection with the tribes. Many French people spoke native American languages, and many married Native women, even joining their tribes from time to time.
On the other hand, the English had a much more turbulent relationship with the Native Americans. However, the English were 20 times larger in number than the French, making them a more strategic partner. They had also promised land and other concessions to Native Americans who fought on their side through the Treaty of Easton.
If I were the leader of a tribe, I would side with the French, as they had a better track record of helping the Native Americans. This in fact is what most Native American tribes did.
Answer:
he had power, money, and influence
The removal of forest is called deforestation ............
