A historical source can be deemed unreliable if the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint. In this cas

Question

Ivahew [28]

3 years ago

13

A historical source can be deemed unreliable if the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint. In this cas

e, the source is?????

History

2 answers:

omeli [17] · Answer 1 · 2021-12-01T04:22:40+03:00

omeli [17]3 years ago

4 0

The source is considered biased and unreliable for not providing neutral information. Hope this helped

Shkiper50 [21] · Answer 2 · 2021-12-01T05:57:41+03:00

Answer:

biased.

Explanation:

Historical research is a very complicated and nuanced kind of research for, in dealing with historical events, it is always difficult to take into consideration the perspective and relevance of all parties involved in a given event. For this reason, it is extremely important to try to corroborate the information gained through historical sources in order to avoid repeating and propagating what is already a biased, and for this reason, unreliable and incomplete, historical view.