The Annapolis meeting created the <em>need for the Philadelphia Convention</em>. The delegates of a few states gathered to address the topic of trade among the states, which, at the same time, led to other important topics of the Confederation. This way, they considered a Constitution would have to be drafted in order to address many other relevant topics of the country, aside from commercial trade. The <em>United States Constitution was drafted at the Philadelphia Convention</em> in 1787.
Answer:
They had more confidence and economic relations with one another. The Spanish, on the other hand, did not have friendly relations with the locals. However, one thing they had in common was that the Spanish and French ultimately married local native American women, resulting in the creation of distinct communities.
There is one step missing and it is;
US president Ronald Reagan delivered a famous speech challenging Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to tear
down the Berlin Wall.
Answer:
The events from first to last are presented below.
Explanation:
Looking at the image, the events from first to last are;
The first event was: The Soviet forces constructed the Berlin Wall to prevent the escape of East Germans into West Germany.
The second event was: US president Ronald Reagan delivered a famous speech challenging Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin Wall.
The third event was: Newly independent Hungary opened its border with Austria.
The fourth event was: East German leaders gave orders to open the gates of the Berlin Wall.
The fifth event was: The representatives of East
and West Germany signed the Reunification Treaty.
<span>Farmer's were greatly affected by the dust bowl. The dust bowl was a huge drought in the Great Plains of the USA. With no rain, crops were not able to grow. When crops don't grow, farmers have no means of providing for their families.</span>
While many Americans know that they have a right to free speech, the lay opinion often views the degree of protection afforded by the United State Constitution as much broader than it is in reality. The First Amendment does not protect all types of speech.
The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.” While it states “Congress,” the protections are also against state government and local public officials from making any law that abridges a person’s freedom of speech. However, simply because the government cannot make a law of this nature does not mean that individuals are free to say anything that they want to. For example, employers may prohibit certain types of speech that would not violate a person’s First Amendment rights if the employer was not a public employer.
So I believe the answers would either be B or C (:
Thanks me and mark as brainliest (:
