1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nasty-shy [4]
4 years ago
13

Who had overwhelming support from the Legislative branch during the 1946 Governors controversy and later became the undisputed G

overnor after a special election was held?
History
1 answer:
avanturin [10]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

idk

Explanation:idk

You might be interested in
Which number is CLOSEST to the St. Lawrence River?
MArishka [77]

Answer:

1

Explanation:

222222222222222223222210

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Bill of Rights have to be written
bazaltina [42]

Answer:

James Madison wrote the amendments, which list specific prohibitions on governmental power, in response to calls from several states for greater constitutional protection for individual liberties. ... Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

6 0
2 years ago
How would you describe the layout of streets and buildings in Dubai and London? What similarities and differences do you notice
labwork [276]

Answer:

The tall building is the most dominating symbol of the cities and a human-made marvel that defies gravity by reaching to the clouds. It embodies unrelenting human aspirations to build even higher. It conjures a number of valid questions in our minds. The foremost and fundamental question that is often asked: Why tall buildings? This review paper seeks to answer the question by laying out arguments against and for tall buildings. Then, it provides a brief account of the historic and recent developments of tall buildings including their status during the current economic recession. The paper argues that as cities continue to expand horizontally, to safeguard against their reaching an eventual breaking point, the tall building as a building type is a possible solution by way of conquering vertical space through agglomeration and densification. Case studies of some recently built tall buildings are discussed to illustrate the nature of tall building development in their respective cities. The paper attempts to dispel any discernment about tall buildings as mere pieces of art and architecture by emphasizing their truly speculative, technological, sustainable, and evolving nature. It concludes by projecting a vision of tall buildings and their integration into the cities of the 21st century.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How would colonist boycotts of British goods be harmful to Britain’s economy
Mila [183]

Answer:

If the British expected the Townshend Acts to be accepted by the Americans, they were sorely disappointed. The Townshend Acts further exacerbated the relations between the Americans and the British. American newspapers immediately began to criticize The Acts. The most influential opponent of the Acts was a Pennsylvanian farmer by the name of John Dickinson. Dickinson wrote a series of letters that were published by the Pennsylvania Chronicle and Universal Advertiser. These letters became known as "The 12 letters from a farmer in Pennsylvania". The first letter appeared on December 2nd 1767. These letters were reproduced in 19 of the 23 colonial newspapers.

The overriding theme of Dickinson's letters was that the English had the right to regulate trade. However, Dickinson maintained the English had no right to impose taxes on the colonies, since the colonies were not represented in the parliament. Dickinson suggested in his letters that the colonist petition directly to the King. Dickinson advised that until their grievances were met the colonists should boycott all English goods.

The Massachusetts Assembly was called into session on December 30, 1767. It met for 16 days, during which time, it debated a resolution attacking the Townshend Acts. At the end of the meeting the Assembly approved a letter written primarily by Samuel Adams that was to be circulated to the other colonies. The letter called on all the colonies to resist the Townshend Acts The letter stated that the parliament had no right to tax the colonies for the sole purpose of raising revenues, since the Americans were not represented in the parliament.

The British government responded with outrage to actions of the assembly. The British demanded that the assembly either rescind the letter or the assembly would be disbanded. The British government knew this was a dangerous path to take, but went ahead anyway. The governor requested the presence of British troops in the colony of Massachusetts, which only further inflamed that colony. When the Massachusetts Assembly met again, it was even more-anti British. The only business the Assembly wished to conduct were protests against the Townshend Acts.

Massachusetts was not the only colony to object to the Townshend Acts. The part of the Acts entitled, "The New York Restraining Act:, attracted the most resentment from the New York Assembly, who over the objections of the governor passed a resolution stating that the parliament had no right to suspend a state assembly. The New York legislator further affirmed that the Assembly had the right to correspond with representatives of any other colony, if it wished.

South Carolina joined the ranks of legislatures protesting the Acts, and was soon the most vociferous of its opponents. Ultimately, it was not the political protest that had the most effect on the British, but it was the boycotts by the colonists. All of the colonies organized boycott committees. With the encouragement of the Sons of Liberty colonial merchants began boycotting British goods. This effectively cut the American purchases from England by half, seriously effecting British merchants. Between the economic and political boycotts the colonists had become united, as never before, in opposition to the British actions.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
By 1967 the size of antiwar protests showed that:
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is d) opposition to the war was no longer radical.

Explanation:

During the Vietnam War different demonstrations took place to demand that the war stop. People who opposed the war went from being radical groups to general opposition.

These demonstrations began with small student associations, then different groups joined, which included religious, mothers of soldiers, veterans, hippies, and human rights organizations, managing to join more than 500,000 people who marched in 1967 to Washington to demand the finished of the war that was going on in Vietnam.

<em />

<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following sources is most likely biased?
    12·1 answer
  • Farmers from _______ revolted against its unresponsive government. This uprising was led by _______, a veteran of the American R
    15·1 answer
  • Where did post-war decolonization occur?<br><br> Any help will be appreciated thank you! ☺️
    15·1 answer
  • Enter the word you received when you completed the timeline rise and spread of islam activity
    7·2 answers
  • Who won the world war two?
    15·1 answer
  • A man got into a fight and killed his opponent. when he went to trial, he had a mental breakdown. he did not know where he was a
    5·1 answer
  • One of the names brought up in the Iran-Contra scandal was:
    6·2 answers
  • List 4 weaknesses of the articles of confederation
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME
    13·1 answer
  • What were some of the early tools to help aid in measurement.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!