The sentences which express the reluctance of the soldiers to talk about their experience in war are as follows:
1. If they had been reticent men it would have been different, but some of them were talkers and some were even boasters.
2. They would discuss their experiences right up to the time of battle and then suddenly they wouldn't talk anymore.
3. It was thought that what they had seen or done was so horrible that they didn't want to bring it back to haunt them or their listeners. But many of these men had no such consideration in any other field.
Looking at the sentences written above, it will be seen that the statements are basically expressing the reluctance of the men of war to engage in discussions that have to do with the war. Although many of them are talkatives and talk very well when other topics are been discussed, they become quiet when the discussions turn to that of war. This shows that they are not interested in sharing their experience of war.<span />
In Act III, Scene 3, Hamlet has an opportunity to kill Claudius, but he doesn't act because he doesn't want to risk sending Claudius to heaven by killing him in prayer. Hamlet doesn't want to break the decorum. He wants to surprise a villain in some vile deed and kill him at that. "<span>He took my father grossly, full of bread,
</span><span>With all his crimes broad blown, as flush as May." If Claudius didn't care about his brother's immortal soul, Hamlet should now pay extra attention to Claudius' soul and do his best to send it to hell. </span>The very thought of the risk stops his sword.
Hamlet's inaction in Scene 3 is not just a result of plain superstition. Hamlet doesn't just want to kill and annihilate Claudius; he symbolically and unequivocally condemns his uncle's soul to hell. However, one scene later, he kills Polonius, mistaking him for Claudius. All his restraints are now off, and he is free to kill the person hiding behind the curtain.
This plot choice clearly shows that Hamlet always acts like an intellectual, even when he is hurt and offended. He has to rationalize both his inaction and his action. More precisely, thinking always precedes (and motivates) his actions and inactions. Irony has it that his action is misdirected, once it happens.
By the way, the R.A.C.E. analytical method contains Restatement, Answer, Citation, and Explanation. I think I've covered all the elements here.
The chart is the answer so D
First "reason" should be plural, don't forget to add proper punctuation and don't forget to capitalize but your evidence is good and your structure needs tobe in a essay format.