1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kotegsom [21]
3 years ago
11

How did the philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and john Locke differ ?

History
2 answers:
vagabundo [1.1K]3 years ago
4 0
To Hobbes, the government can do anything it wants. The people give up their rights to an absolute ruler. The major difference<span>, then, is that </span>Locke<span> envisions a very limited government while </span>Hobbes believes<span> in the need for an absolute monarchy.</span>
crimeas [40]3 years ago
4 0

In other words, Hobbes supported absolute monarchy, while Locke supported popular sovereignty.

You might be interested in
Que entiende como socialismo del siglo XXl
Effectus [21]

Answer:

what are the choices?

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
HELPP MARK BRAINLIESt
Naddik [55]

Answer:

nobility, clergy, peasantry,

Explanation:

i'm not 100% sure i just searched it up

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What of the following is NOT a characteristic of formalism?
wlad13 [49]
What are the answer choices?
6 0
2 years ago
Compare a democratic form of government to that of a dictatorship.
Maksim231197 [3]
Idk what do you think lol
6 0
3 years ago
what conflict does whyte see between the american value of individualism and the fact of organization life?
jeka94

Answer:

According to the text The Organization Man written by William H. Whyte, Jr., the conflict between American individualism and life in the organization is that individualism preaches that man should be responsible for his achievements, but life in the organization causes the individual to depend on other individuals to achieve some achievement.

Explanation:

William H. Whyte, Jr. describes life in the organization as a group of middle-class individuals who have a stable life that depends on the joint work of several people and that this joint work allows this economic and social stabilization. However, this set of individuals must be maintained, since the success of one depends on the work of the other. This goes entirely against American individualism, which encouraged each individual to pursue their own rise, whether social or economic, or even academic. This generates a conflict in the values of society that can generate contradictory concepts that show that you must be responsible for your success, however, you can see people who have a good life and are not the only ones responsible for their success.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the Era of good feelings
    15·2 answers
  • The Indus River Valley Civilization emerged in what region?
    5·2 answers
  • Why were the Balkans so important to Germany's war effort in WWI?
    6·1 answer
  • Which issue would the Democratic Party<br> most<br> likely support?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the name for 200 year period of peace in roman empire
    11·1 answer
  • How did industrialist Henry Kaiser make a difference in the war effort? Check all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • During the 1840s, more than 1 million people died of starvation and disease in Ireland as a result of
    14·2 answers
  • Why was the Constitutional Convention necessary?
    12·1 answer
  • HELP!!!
    8·2 answers
  • What was Vladimir Lenin purpose
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!