so whats the answer
to this question
Answer:
The lie is that Maleeka destriyed Ms. Saunder's room.
Answer:
That would be Ray Tomlinson. :)
Explanation:
"In Flanders Fields" and "Dulce et Decorum Est!" both use the same event but they reveal completely different views of World War 1. In the first mentioned story author shows his respect to those who was fighting for their country and future generations, persuading the reader to feel the same and to be ready to protect their motherland. Author of the second story describes all the frightening moments of war and convinces the readers that it if they had to stand on the front line it would be the worst experience in their life. So, In Flanders Fields" eulogize war while "Dulce et Decorum Est!" warrns against it.
To start off, you want to get zero population growth. That means you can eliminate A and D automatically since it's the opposite effect of what you want.
That leaves B and C. Both are good idea if I may say but, they are unreasonable and unethical. (Not as much as A and D) Although, it is only just a question.
After a good time of thinking this through I would pick letter C. Let me explain though.
It is very easy to increase the death rate. There are so many ways to achieve zero population growth by doing so.
Now, obviously this means you would have to (for a nicer term) put down people. Those I will not list but, you can surely image them if you'd wish.
The reason I took B out of the equation is because, I feel as though it would take too long. That's the only reason.
Like I said I would pick C. I hope this helps!!
