Patrick Henry believed in the "clean" form of government in which government officials and the entire government, in general, shouldn't be corrupt. He refused a strong central government and denied attendance to the meeting in which it had become the Constitutional Convention, fearing that the decision for a Constitution will be too centralized and strong for the people to have freedom.
B.) The Constitution gave more power to the federal government than the Articles of Confederation did.
Under the Articles, the federal government had power to declare war, make alliances, and a few other duties. The main power lied in the states' hands. The Constitution made the federal government have more power. It also created 3 branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) rather than only one (legislative).
Hope this helps.
I believe it was the division of Byzantium and the Latin West. Byzantium was the emperor of Constantinople the area around Greece and Turkey and North into Russia. Latin West was under the control of different people until dominance of the Franks in the region. Another powerful and well noted authority was the Pope. Basically...there was a the decline of Rome and different views on the Christian doctrine. (Q_Q ) That's the best way I can word it.
Some third-party goals eventually become planks in the platforms of the major parties.
Answer:
Tag-Teaming
Explanation:
'Tag-Teaming' a hold requires at least two senators that want to hold the legislation indefinitely. The first senator (anonymously) places a hold on the legislation, and then, before their name is entered into the record, releases the hold. As a result, Senators can effectively wage (or threaten to wage) a filibuster – in effect, insist on extended debate in order to delay or prevent a final vote on most amendments, bills, or other motions.
Have a great day! :D