Answer:
the answer is d i just did it
Explanation:
Answer:
Definitely the first one, probably the second and third as well?
Explanation:
A first-person narrator is usually recounting an event, so they definitely use 'I'.
A third-person narrator sometimes knows the thoughts of other characters, depending on whether they're omniscient or not.
A first-person narrator is likely to show bias I think, because they're telling the story from their point of view so they're very likely to share their opinions and stuff. I don't really know, you're gonna kinda have to decide on this one.
A third-person narrator sometimes takes part? I mean, if they're third-person limited then usually it's the POV of a character but from a more detached persona? For example, in the Heroes of Olympus series all the chapters are in third person limited but all the characters take part in the action. If it's third-person omniscient then I don't think they'd be taking part in the action, unless the narrator is like a dude from the future recounting events that happened to his younger self and all that stuff. I don't really know, man.
<span>e. b and c only
As long as a speaker lets the audience know who the author of a study is, and gives a brief overview of their credentials or qualifications, the audience should be able to trust the information that the speaker is presenting, based on their credible research.</span>
"The Grand Canyon is a stunning sight" is an independent clause.
i nstagram and t witter,
You make me bitter
Make my eyes hurt
Because You Tube gets me turnttttt
I love you, Social Media
How the fu
