For the first question, if a author uses the pronoun ''you'' to tell a story, his point of view is second person.
For the second question, the answer would be C) imply.
For the third question, the vocabulary word ''purl'' means swirl.
Answer:
Michael believes that the competition responsible for the his condition during the "Flu Game".
Explanation:
He and his teammates had gotten hungry. They decided to order pizza. It arrived but only Michael ended up eating it.
Minutes later, he was sick.
Answer:
A woman walks to the doors of the store, the doors open with a soft whoosh and is meet with warm air. She steps past the threshold and is greeted with the sight of other people ranging in ages walking around holding red baskets some had items within it. Grabbing a red basket, noting the lightness of it before walking past others to look at the coffees. She stops in front of the coffees and is surrounded with the smell of roasted coffee beans, hints of sweetness and bitterness in the air. An old woman stops nearby and grabs a dark roast an walks away after giving her a smile, the imposing shelves tower of her with hundreds of different brands and flavors. She tentatively reach's out and grabs a light roast with small pieces of candy cane's and sets it softly in the basket she is holding in her left hand. She wanders the store for a little while before walking to the self checkout, after paying for the coffee she puts it in a plastic bag and walks to the doors that open with a small whoosh and is greeted by a rush of cold air.
This help?
Answer:
The author believes that the best approach towards free speech in the private sector is for the private entities to censor speech by their users.
Explanation:
According to the author, private entities were responsible for the censoring of free speech not the state.
He went on to say that these private sectors have the rights to offer these regulations on their different platforms and make exclusions to certain speech of their members.
Evidence can be see in the third paragraph. The author implied here that private sector has a right to invoke the first amendment clause that limits speeches that are lawless, full of threat and obscenity.
