When studying cause and effect, historians usually group the causes into different categories. For example, <u>cultural causes</u> reflect how a society’s literature and art convey the way the society saw itself in relation to the rest of the world. Another resource that historians use to understand society is <u>pop culture</u>, which tells them the trends and ideas that are preferred by the common people. When studying cause and effect, it’s important to remember <u>multiple causation</u>, or the idea that an effect could have several causes and vice versa.
The correct option is “cultural causes” since art and literature are related to the culture of a place. Culture is determined by literature, art, music.
The correct option is “pop culture” since it reflects the likes and ideas of common people whereas the rest of the options do not focus on common people.
The correct option is “multiple causation” since it refers to the idea that events are caused by multiple reasons, not just a single one.
Because he said that he wasn't fit to be president and never should have been
Yes I do think so I studied it
Victorian ideals valued respectability and restraint. One was to be polite and courteous and dutiful, not pushy or overbearing.
The Fabian Society was a group aiming for a moral remaking of Britain according to a socialist model, but they were much more refrained and respectable in their approach than Marxists who sought revolution. Founded in 1883, the Fabian Society sought change by gradual means, not through violence or agitation. They took their name from the Roman general Quintus Fabius <span>Maximus Verrucosus, who was nicknamed "</span><span>Cunctator" ("delayer") for his use of delaying tactics rather than a direct attack in confronting the army of Hannibal in the Second Punic War.</span>
