Here we go..
These questions deal with opinion and perspective supplied by facts, so if this is purely academic there is no perfect answer. In my opinion, yes imperial rule has always been bad. There are positive things about empires, that is what makes them interesting. There are pros and cons, but often that not (speaking in both modern and recent times) the pros are supposed to blot out the cons. The Roman Empire is an ancient example, so yeah those pros weren't mean to blot out the cons. Never forget this, most pros of the imperial government are to make 'managing' easier. If the people dont want to be ruled by a foreign power, then youll get what you always have. Riots and whatnot. Ha, flip open any area of a text book and youll find the answer to "What is a lot or half the people dont want the imperialism?" Listen, there is no such thing as a completely good anything. But also, never let that be an excuse for injustice. Whether or not you judge yours or someone elses empire as good depends on you really, how you feel what you want, your morals. And if you want specific examples - I have plenty. But I am tired of typing now so if you want examples just msg me. Hope I helped
The correct document to fill the diagram is English Bill of Rights.
The Magna Carta was made in June 15, 1215 when feudal barons forced a document King John of England the aim of limiting his power and protecting their interests, therefore, the arrow points to Limited Monarchy, which it simbolizes.
The English Bill of Rights of 1689 was created after King James II refused to recognize the rights of the English people and was replaced by the diarchy of William and Mary. The document represents an important mar for self-government, once the English people required the regal authority to execute laws only with the consent of Parliament. The King’s power became more limited and represented a bigger involvement of the people.
It is worth knowing that while the Mayflower Compact written in 1620 was the first document of self-government created in America, it was created once pilgrims realized they had landed outside the jurisdiction of the Virginia Charter, but it does not have the impact and representation of the Bill of Rights, which inspired a lot of different treaties and documents all around the world since its creation.
Ashley's fetus is likely to be affected if it is in the first trimester or the first twelve weeks of pregnancy. Rubella is virus and women who are pregnant and come into contact with the pathogen are diagnosed with Congenital Rubella Syndrome. Pregnant women who contract the virus can undergo a miscarriage or have a still birth infant. <span />
The correct answer is C) by overriding the veto and expanding the agency's powers.
<em>When President Johnson vetoed a law that would extend the Freedmen's Bureau, Congress reacted by overriding the veto and expanding the agency's powers.</em>
President Jhonson and Congress lived many moments of tension during the Reconstruction. President Johnson vetoes did not like the Congress and it became a permanent conflict between the legislative branch and the executive branch.
The Freedmen's Bureau of 1865 was established to help African American people and poor white men that lived in the South, after the end of the Civil War. So it is true that when President Johnson vetoed a law that would extend the Freedmen's Bureau, Congress reacted by overriding the veto and expanding the agency's powers.
Answer:
Benito Amilcare Andrea Mussolini (July 29, 1883 to April 28, 1945), who went by the nickname “Il Duce” (“the Leader”), was an Italian dictator who created the Fascist Party in 1919 and eventually held all the power in Italy as the country’s prime minister from 1922 until 1943. An ardent socialist as a youth, Mussolini followed in his father's political footsteps but was expelled by the party for his support of World War I. As dictator during World War II, he overextended his forces and was eventually killed by his own people in Mezzegra, Italy.
Explanation:
