If the story of "All Quiet on the Western Front" was told today, the story would be much different, especially if it was told from the viewpoint of an American soldier involved in the War on Terror. First, the protagonist would not be coming from a nation that is in a state of total war. The War on Terror is a limited war and does not require the undivided focus of the American government, industry, and economy. A soldier, today, would likely be volunteering to join the military, instead of being all but forced to like the characters in "All Quiet on the Western Front." Second, the total detachment the soldiers in "All Quiet on the Western Front" feel from their civilian lives would not be as pronounced, given how today's soldiers are able to communicate with their friends and family back home by way of email, online chat, and quicker postal service. Thirdly, today's American soldiers are provided with far better and more extensive military training than the soldiers in "All Quiet on the Western Front" are, hence they would be more prepared for the combat experiences they must endure.
Answer:
Narendra Modi since 2014
Explanation:
I think correct me if I'm wrong
Answer:
The main difference was discretion. Flappers were the liberated women of the post-World War 1 years, and they could be easily identified by their clothing. They also indulged openly in many practices (smoking, cursing, etc.) which, if Victorian women did them, they did them secretly.
Explanation:
They emphasized the need to fight for civil rights and against the war in Vietnam. This was during the Fourth Great awakening as some historians like to call that period of time. The preachers were often social activists and the churches organized protests and support for people who wanted to fight inequality.
President Theodore Roosevelt compared the role of a president to that of the role of a "Steward," since it is this persons role to look after the passengers on a ship.
