1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dolphi86 [110]
4 years ago
12

Fred is involved in a heated argument with Gene. Gene believes that the stages of a child's cognitive development are worthy of

study. Fred sarcastically comments that this field of study is nothing more than speculation about the mind and that all that really matters is what you observe individuals doing. Gene is taking a _____ approach, while Fred is a proponent of the _____ approach.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Ede4ka [16]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Gene is taking a Piagetian approach, while Fred is a proponent of the behaviorist approach.

Explanation:

Piaget's approach and studies centers on the fact that a child goes trough certain <em>cognitive stages,</em> in which a development occurs. These are:

  1. Sensorimotor Stage.
  2. Preoperational Stage.
  3. Concrete Operational Stage.
  4. Formal Operational Stage.

Meanwhile, a behaviorist approach centers on the fact that what matters is <em>what we can see</em> which is the behavior, instead of only creating speculation about the mind since it is <em>not tangible. </em>

You might be interested in
A small pellet of uranium dioxide is about the size of an eraser on a pencil and contains the energy equivalent of ______.
mel-nik [20]

A small pellet of uranium dioxide is about the size of an eraser on a pencil and contains the energy equivalent of <u>a ton of coal</u>.

More about uranium dioxide:

The mineral uraninite naturally contains uranium dioxide, also known as uranium(IV) oxide (UO2), urania, or uranous oxide.

It is a black, radioactive, crystalline powder. It is a component of nuclear reactor fuel rods. MOX fuel is a blend of uranium and plutonium dioxides. It was employed as a black and yellow hue in ceramic glazes and glass before 1960.

The solid is isostructural with fluorite (calcium fluoride), having a cubic configuration with each U being surrounded by eight O nearest neighbours. When uranium dioxide comes into contact with carbon, it carbonises and produces carbon monoxide and uranium carbide.

Learn more about uranium here:

brainly.com/question/9099776

#SPJ4

3 0
2 years ago
________ refers to behavior based on traditions, concerns for other people, and values they share together.
adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

Collectivism

Explanation:

Collectivism is a  cultural structure that favors the needs of a group and communities over the desires of individual. It emphasis such cultures in which relationships with other members of the group and people's interconnections play a central role in the identification of each individual. Some countries considered collectivism include Japan, China, Korea, India etc.

4 0
3 years ago
What conditions led to development of feudalism in both western Europe and Japan
lbvjy [14]
The Bubonic plague and the raids by Vikings.
3 0
3 years ago
Political leaders often supported Protestantism because they wanted more power.
Kobotan [32]
This statement is correct. true. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following does culture contribute to the preferences and
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the Mississippi Freedom Democratic party mfdp emerge at the Democratic party convention in the Atlantic city in 1964?
    14·1 answer
  • Could someone please help me!!!
    15·1 answer
  • What did the missionaries do
    11·2 answers
  • What did the Freedom Riders hope to accomplish?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes relative location?
    13·1 answer
  • Why is it important to understand the United States judicial system? I need this ASAP
    9·1 answer
  • It is never a good idea to call out meeting participants by name to ask them for their thoughts.
    12·1 answer
  • What class of people were most attracted to the laissez-faire economic philosophy
    10·1 answer
  • How many vertebrae in the adult vertebral colum
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!