1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grigory [225]
3 years ago
15

Which of the following individuals would most likely be a plebeian in the Roman empire

Social Studies
2 answers:
nydimaria [60]3 years ago
7 0
A poor craftsperson              
KATRIN_1 [288]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The individual who would most likely be plebeian in the Roman Empire is a poor craftsperson. The correct answer is C. A plebeian means a commoner, so an average person in the Roman Empire would fall under this category. A is incorrect because slaves had no status whatsoever - they had no rights and were owned by others. A wealthy senator would belong to the patricians, and an emperor would belong to the highest class.

You might be interested in
Which action is protected by the first amendment?​
marissa [1.9K]

Answer:

Привет! Кто-нибудь читал Криспину крест ведущего? Если да, то может ли кто-нибудь дать мне представление о том, как он изменился в этой истории! Спасибо за ваше время!

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For most of the 1920s, how did the growth of credit affect the stock market?
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
Investors took more risks and the stock market declined.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the United States, the bulk of health care spending is paid by health insurance companies. Such a system is also called a thi
shutvik [7]

Answer:

The correct answer is because the over-consume

Explanation:

The over-consumption of the services provided by health insurance companies are athe main reason of the inefficency of the system because in the end the consumer is paying a price that is below the standards for these services provided because of the nominal fee so the unbalance in the system's market ends up affecting the whole system in a very negative way, leading to an inefficient outcome.

4 0
3 years ago
Why do you think South Africa should invest more in africa​
STatiana [176]

It’s important to acknowledge that Africa tests an investor’s patience. Time horizons and return models that fit other markets don’t always work in there. Even the most experienced, sophisticated companies can be forced to recalibrate, as Nestlé did last year when it announced a 15% cut in its workforce across 21 African countries.

Deficits remain. What’s important is that investors now realize there is money to be made for those bold enough to help close the gaps. As that takes place, the promise of greater prosperity for Africans and African businesses will be realized. Why is it a good time to invest?

1. Africa needs ‘connectors’

Missing across much of sub-Saharan Africa are the roads, rails, ports, airports, power grids and IT backbone needed to lift African economies. This lack of infrastructure hinders the growth of imports, exports, and regional business.

Companies that can connect Africans and markets can prosper. Sub-Saharan Africa is plagued by power outages – almost 700 hours a year on average – sapping productivity, adding cost and leaving businesses captive to back-up and alternative power options. Massive investment is leading to major upgrades and expansion at African ports and airports, but much of Africa’s growth potential depends on in-country and intra-African road, rail and air connections.

Roads and rail lines are sparse, decrepit and over-burdened. A lack of aviation agreements has limited intra-African air connections. Africa’s lack of efficient storage and distribution infrastructure hinders businesses, entrepreneurs and farmers. Up to 50% of African fruit and vegetables spoil before reaching markets.

There’s a soft infrastructure deficit, as well. Outside of South Africa, the data and information critical to decision-making by businesses is missing or hard to obtain – credit and risk information, market data, consumption patterns, you name it. Lessons from Dubai and Singapore tell us that once an infrastructure race is on in a rapidly expanding market, being the first-mover is a significant advantage for investors.

2. African trade barriers are falling and intra-African trade holds enormous potential

With the 54-nation Continental Free Trade Area – Africa’s own mega-trade deal – even the smallest African economies could see a lift. If duties are lowered and incentives introduced, manufacturers could see benefit from setting up production and assembly operations in multiple African countries. That could lead to development in electronics, machinery, chemicals, textile production and processed foods.

As a first step, free trade between and within the African economic blocs would make a huge difference. Africa’s share of global trade – a meager 3% – can only increase if the continent’s commodity and consumption-led economies begin to produce a broad array of goods for home markets and export.

And an increase in local beneficiation in the commodities sector could be a driver of growth – processing local commodities (such as minerals, coffee, cotton) in country rather than exporting them in raw form. That said, it will continue to be a challenge for regions with poor power and infrastructure to compete as global manufacturers.

3. Customers are changing

With the growth of Africa’s middle class, we’re seeing development of new expectations. Educated, urban professionals are young, brand-aware and sophisticated in terms of their consumption. Retailers and consumer brands want to anticipate and drive buying preferences in fashion, home and lifestyle products, but they know they need international standard supply chains if they are to meet demand. The largest economic forces in Africa are small to medium enterprises, working to meet this new demand and competing with global brands

hope \: its \: helpful \: to \: you \: please \: mark \: me \: a \: brainliest

8 0
3 years ago
The media's emphasis on the slowly improving american economic situation in 2012 rather than the record number of long-term unem
Roman55 [17]

The media's emphasis on the slowly improving American economic situation in 2012, rather than the record number of long-term unemployed Americans is an example of agenda setting.

Agenda setting is described as the "ability to influence" the importance of topics on the public agenda. Since the media focused more on the improving economic situation, the general public was less concerned about the high unemployment rates. Many people likely didn't realize this was the case if they only received their information from the media.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why are ralph and jack cooperating with each other in spite of their hard feelings?
    10·1 answer
  • Positive reinforcement is based on two facts about human nature: people appreciate recognition, and they​
    14·1 answer
  • The muckrakers provided a service to the public in the early 20th century by what reason
    6·1 answer
  • 1. The following was heard on a primetime news cast. "The government has just increased the sales tax. This is unfair to consume
    8·1 answer
  • after what battle was the medal of disillusionment given to soldiers? what is the significance of the battle? what does this par
    6·1 answer
  • Multiply 3 by powers of ten​
    8·1 answer
  • When culture spreads because one country has defeated another in war, this is called cultural diffusion through A.Conquest B.Tec
    15·2 answers
  • In preparing for the 40th high school reunion, Jill and Ed correctly identified 75% of their classmates from a pile of old photo
    13·1 answer
  • Ano-ano ang mga misyong ginagampanan ng bawat kasapi ng pamilya?​
    8·1 answer
  • Which represents the main cause of the cultural conflicts in the 1920s:
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!