Imperial China suspected that they were unrivaled and that they had all the stuff that the Europeans as of now have. So they didn't need anything from them. China had dependably thought itself as the focal point of the world along these lines its name signifying "Focal/Middle Kingdom." But much to their dismay that Europe amidst the nineteenth century had gotten on to them and in the long run would outperform China monetarily. So China's haughtiness and thought of prevalence was a reason over the ruin of the Chinese domain. Japan then again discovered that they needed to adjust and acknowledge that Western innovation had outperformed the East to survive. Japan rapidly ended up industrialized and furthermore outperformed China. Japan at that point turned into a Great Power and figured out how to crush the Russians and colonized the greater part of East Asia and Southeast Asia.
Answer:
D is the answer.
Explanation:
The environment is not changing in any of these scenarios. Mark me Brainliest if you like my answer!
Answer: Under Shotoku Taishi, a regent who ruled Japan with Empress Suiko, Japan started using the Chinese political and moral philosophy Confucianism to reform its government. ... Through Korea, the major Asian religion Buddhism traveled from China to Japan and became a major influence on Japanese culture
Explanation:
<u><em>Texas change in 1821 by controlling the state that is shifted from Spain to Mexico and it became an independent republic.</em></u>
Answer: Option B & C
<u>Explanation:</u>
In 1821, Mexico acquired their independence after 11 years of fighting Spain. Miguel Hidalgo is the one who started the independence act in Mexico. Hence he is known to be the father of Mexican Texas independence.
Vincente Guerrero And Agustine de Iturbide brought independence. Also, Mexico was established as a new country including the land of Spanish Texas. That is the ending of Spanish Texas. Eventually, Texas also became an independent state. And Mexican Texas became the part of the nation.
I'm a capitalist myself i can tell you the facts,
one OPPOSING view point to capitalism is if there is no regulations for businesses people think that CEO's can overwork union workers and give them lower wages without any punishment.
A SUPPORTING view point to capitalism is that with fewer restrictions there is more opportunity for individual success and profit for business.
ANY QUESTIONS?