Both of these are linear functions:
Distance A is d=2.5h and is proportional to time because the distance is just 2.5 times however many hours you have traveled.
Distance B is d= 2(h-1) + 4. This is not proportional to time but it is a linear function.
No, we can only suppose that the observed distribution deviates from the expected distribution when we reject the null hypothesis.
<h3>What is a null hypothesis?</h3>
The null hypothesis exists as a specific mathematical theory that claims that there exists no statistical relationship and significance between two sets of observed data and estimated phenomena for each set of selected, single observable variables. The null hypothesis can be estimated to define whether or not there exists a relationship between two measured phenomena, which creates it useful. It can let the user comprehend if the outcomes exist as the product of random events or intentional manipulation of a phenomenon.
To learn more about the null hypothesis refer to:
brainly.com/question/13135308
#SPJ4
Her batting average would be 34/99, which is 0.343
9,11,14
the pattern is add one then add two then add three
-3i+3/4+2i-9/3-3i=(3/4-9/3) +(-3i+2i-3i)=(3/4-3)+(-4i)=(3/4-12/4)-4i=
=-9/4-4i
