Deurbanisation is the act of people moving away from urban areas and going rural, it happened in the British period because people saw a flood of British machine made goods and artisans lost their work so they moved back to their villages
<span>Thomas Jefferson led the opposition to the Marshall Court.
Jefferson never backed down from complaining against the judiciary system at
every occasion possible. This was the stand taken by Thomas Jefferson against
Marshall for denouncing it. Whenever the situation demanded Jefferson rose to
the occasion to oppose. Jefferson was a person who believed in giving rights to
the states rather than keeping the power centralised. Jefferson was totally
opposed to the federal government having huge power. He also was opposed to the
idea of supreme court judicial review system. </span>
Answer:
The opening shots of the French Revolution in 1789 were treated with a mixture of horror and optimism in Britain. The downfall of the absolute monarchy in France was initially welcomed by some political figures. Some like Edmund Burke believed that a wave of reform would sweep across Europe, with long-overdue political reform in Britain following in its wake.
Burke later revised his attitudes to the revolution, however, claiming that the stability of the British constitution and her hard-won libertarian principles represented a more stable bedrock on which parliamentary reform should be built. Burke’s rejection of the bloodshed in France was later published in his Reflections on the Revolution in France which sparked a fierce debate during the 1790s regarding the outcome of the Reign of Terror across the channel. Though many political groups continued to take inspiration from the actions of the sans-culottes, others like Burke predicted chaos and turmoil should Britain follow a similar revolutionary route. Such responses resulted in strict measures imposed by Prime Minister William Pitt in the 1790s, designed to stem any criticism of the government and to curb the activities of political radicals.
States with a smaller population were probably happier with the old Articles of Confederation.
Further Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation was America's first system of government after becoming free from British rule. The goal of this constitution was to give very little power to the central (aka federal) government. Americans wanted a small central government because while they were colonists under the control of Great Britain, there was a tyrannical/too powerful central government that caused them to rebel.
In order to do this, they create a federal government with just a legislative branch (aka Congress). In Congress, each state had one delegate. This made smaller states like New Jersey, Delaware, etc. happy because they had much smaller populations in comparison to states like Virginia. However, they had just as much political power and influence in Congress as these larger states.
Ultimately, the Articles of Confederation proved to be a highly ineffective form of government. This is why the Constitutional Convention was called. This lead to the creation of the US Constitution we have today.
Learn More:
Creation of the US Constitution- brainly.com/question/9835311
Key Details:
Topic: American History, US Constitution
Grade Level: 7-12
Keywords: Articles of Confederation, Constitutional Convention, US Constitution
Yes, it is true that religion, beliefs, and social norms can influence population distribution, since people who think alike tend to want to live close together--meaning that they pick their territory based on their proximity to like-minded people.
