Four Allied strategies on the European front in World War II included
Answer: Out of all the options presented above the one that were
included in the four allied strategies on the European front in World
War II are, Driving the Axis powers from North Africa. The drive
across France. Closing in on Germany from the east and the west.
Three main obstacles to growth in the Christian life is society, devil and flesh.
Answer:
Emperor Wu, also known as Wudi or Liu Che.
Explanation:
Emperor Wu (141-87 BCE) expanded the influence and the power of the Chinese empire under the Han dynasty as no previous ruler had. He adopted Confucianism as the official state ideology, a decision that had profound and lasting consequences for the culture and history of China, because Confucianism continues to influence and mold Chinese mentality and social life until today, the year 2020. He also incorporated southern China and Vietnam into his lands, and reconquered Korea. He strengthened the empires´s security by attacking and punishing the nomads Xiongnu, a permanent threat to his kingdom.
In the 19th century, the rise of Napoleon's power is due to its victory in military regimes without any differences in the ruling.
<h3>Who was Napolean?</h3>
Napoleon was considered as one of the greatest military leaders and the first ruler of France. He is well known for focusing on achieving the single goal to get success.
Napoleon grew to authority as a result of his military successes. He was a well-known officer from France who received international popularity because of his ruling pattern. He had promised the common people to provide peace and stability due to which they supported him.
He addressed to disillusioned revolutionaries and the old elite by offering them important positions in the growing states.
Learn more about Napolean, here:
brainly.com/question/24959644
#SPJ1
Roman society was one that constantly pushed romans to be more and more ambitious, to take more, do more and conquer more. Eventually you start stepping on people's toes who are trying to do the same thing, then you have two powerful people fighting for ultimate power (ceaser v. pompey, sulla v. marius, augustus v. marc anthony, etc.). Then there was the Marian reforms which made soldiers beholdened primarily to their general, not the state, for their rewards (usually land after the campaign was finished), couple that with legions frequently going further and further from Rome in the late republic, most Roman soldiers knew and depended on their general, and barely interacted with the state at all. So these generals gradually gained ferociously loyal armies that were closer to them than Rome in general, so they'd be pretty willing to fight for their general against another general, even when it would weaken the state as a whole. Obviously civil wars cause a huge amount of damage to their nation, both in lives and monetary cost. Plus usually whoever won the civil war would then proceed to kill all prominent citizens who even slightly leaned toward the opposing side. After two or three purges like this, many of the prominent families that made rome into a world power were completely in shambles and the bitter rivalries between them made future wars inevitable.
