Answer:
In 1638 Anne Hutchinson was kicked out of Boston for “antinomianism.”
So Anne Hutchinson’s view says good character is not necessary for salvation. This is to be “anti-nonmain” — “against law.” The opposite is to make law central — “legalism.” Legalism goes the opposite way and says good character is what is necessary for salvation. But then how good do you have to be? Is anyone really good enough? Can anyone conform to law enough? Perhaps not. No one is perfect. People have weaknesses, secret needs and habits. So we may need some “antinomianism.” If you aren’t good enough but get the benefit anyway, that’s called forgiveness. It seems like forgiveness must be required to go to heaven. Forgiveness negates the necessity of the law. It says you didn’t follow the law properly but it’s okay. If in reality we’re all a bunch of greedy , then we might need a bit of antinomianism to go to heaven. This fundamental problem of Christian religion goes all the way back to the founding and continues today. It’s an inherent logical problem of Christian faith.
Explanation:
Answer:
what is that in English so i can help
Explanation:
Answer: the first one is correct, Hati would be last and Napoleon would be second.
They point out that:
- it's good to have people who speak fluently more than one language ( can be used in international relations)
- bilingualism boosts cognitive development of individuals, studies show that non-native speakers of one language get better at it if they're not loosing contact with their own language (so teach both Spanish and English in southern US, not only English)
Answer:
Abreham licon fought to abolish slavery
Explanation: