Explanation:
Concept of National Income
The National income is the total amount of income accruing to a country from economic activities in a year time. It includes payments made to all resources either in the form of wages, interest, rent, and profit.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Given that
Credit balance of income summary account = $6,800
Debit balance of Withdrawals account = $2,900
Since the credit balance of income summary denotes the net income for the particular period and the debit balance of the withdrawn amount reflects that it is to be shown in the retained earning statement
The journal entry would be
Income summary A/c Dr $6,800
To Retained earning $6,800
(Being the difference is credited to retained earning)
Answer:
Net income after adjustment $225,000
Explanation:
The various adjustments are effected below:
$ Note
Net income before adjustment 232,500
Depreciation (4,400) 1
Rental income 910 2
Supplies (310) 3
Fees earned <u> (3,700) </u> 4
Net income after adjustment <u>225,000</u>
Notes
1 Depreciation represents a consumption of asset hence it is an expense which reduces profit .So, it deducted
2. Rental income accrued implies income earned but not received. So we need to record it for the period it was earned, hence we add it.
3. Supplies used represents consumption of assets, i.e an expense. So, we deduct it from the income.
4. The income received in advance represents unearned income . This would be deducted from the net income
Answer:
Explanation:
Solution-
According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.
(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.
(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.
