Answer:
<u>c. there is the possibility that the funds are used for riskier behavior than the lender agreed to.</u>
Explanation:
True. The term "Moral Hazard" as used in an investment context, often refers to a scenario where one party with a <em>lesser risk burden</em> in a business agreement, <u>deliberately </u>takes investment risk that would be detrimental to others in the agreement who have a higher risk burden.
It is an unethical business practice; a moral hazard, and so acts as a barrier to investors who may want to finance global growth.
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
1 Equipment $53,420
To Cash $53,420
(Being the equipment is purchased for cash is recorded)
The computation is given below:
= Cash price of machine + sales tax + shipping cost + insurance during shipping + installation and testing cost
= $49,500 + $3,650 + $100 + $60 + $110
= $53,420
2. Depreciation expense $9,614
To Accumulated Depreciation - Equipment $9,614
(Being the depreciation expense is recorded)
The computation is shown below:
= ($53,420 - $5,350) ÷ ( 5 years)
= $9,614
Answer:
$90,000
Explanation:
In this question, we compare the net income and the difference should be reported
In the first case, the net income is
= Revenue - expense
= $1,000,000 - $750,000
= $250,000
In the first case, the net income is
= Revenue - expense
where,
Revenue is = $1,000,000 + $150,000 = $1,150,000
And, the expenses is $750,000 + $60,000 = $810,000
= $1,150,000 - $810,000
= $340,000
So, the net profit is increased by
= $340,000 - $250,000
= $90,000
