Answer: The government sought to justify its role in World War I. Various mechanisms were used to justify entering the war. The war had a strong resonance among American society.
Explanation:
- In addition to the mass recruitment of pups during World War I, the U.S. government also sought to influence the population on this occasion. Civilians were called upon to help the nation, and they could do so in many ways. One element of civilian support for the U.S. government was the purchase of war bonds. Civilians could also help with a donation to support U.S. troops. Many are invited to work in the war-based, dedicated industry.
- One of the mechanisms of support for the U.S. war effort was the conduct of certain economic activities, that is, the centralized control of product prices administered by the War Industry Committee. Attempts were made to maintain strict control over oil and food prices, thereby achieving certain economic benefits, to support U.S. troops' military action.
- During the war, the U.S. government sought to develop some military propaganda to justify the entry of the United States into the conflict among the population. The law and espionage were enacted in 1917, as well as an amendment to treason a year later, which sought to eliminate the anti-oppression mood.
- The war greatly affected American society. American troops numbered a large number of African-American soldiers. Their experiences, especially in returning from the battlefield, were extremely unpleasant. Many have experienced different types of racial segregation. The war also affected women. Many are called upon to support the united states in the war with their participation. As many men went to war, the factories were empty. Many women are thus employed in armaments and ammunition factories. And a large number of women were also engaged in battlefields as nurses and cooks
Answer:
A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.
Explanation:
Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law
.
Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.
The guiding principals were, FREE TRADE, END SECRET TREATIES, REDUCE ARMY/NAVY
Peaceful island resting in the middle of a vast ocean on a beautiful sunny day awaiting visitors seeking happiness throughout the soul.
The balfour declaration proclaim : C. British support the creation of a jewish state in Palestine
The balfour declaration was created in november 1917, which content basically showed that the British Favoured a Jewish homeland in Palestine and therefore support the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine
hope this helps