Answer:
not me but I'm turning 14.
Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
If the consumer expected price increase for any reason in such good he will buy it before the time he expects to apply for that increase.
Answer:
Simple rate of return is 5.8%
Therefore option (a) is correct option.
Explanation:
It is given that purchase cost = $793800
Company saving per year = $133000
Yielding = $21200
Annual depreciation = $88200
Annual profit = $133000 - $88200 = $44800
Net investment is equal to = $793800 - $21200 = $772600
Simple rate of return 
= 5.8%
Therefore simple rate of return is 5.8 %
So option (a) is correct.
Reduced by an amount that is equal to an individual's income from other sources
