<span>I
think that the positives of partisanship is that the incumbent political leader
will have the (1) unwavering support from his cohorts with regards to the
projects, programs or laws that he/she will be implementing (2) their
aspirations and objectives are aligned which helps in catalyzing in the changes
that they may want to implement in the government or administration and (3) its
identity can endure simply because it is strengthened by affiliating itself to
gender, ethnic, religious and racial groups thus promoting a connection to a
party which eventually generates political stability and diminish political
influence by independents or nonpartisans. On the downside, partisanship may
(1) promote divisiveness especially if its advocacies are met with great
opposition by the non-cohorts and (2) there will be bias especially if
arguments are thrown against them which leads to the scrutiny of the opposing
views at a greater degree just to refute the said argument.</span>
Answer:
They reduced trade with European countries.
Explanation:
The destruction, the first world war brought to the United States changed its stance towards Europe in the following period which evident from the U.S foreign policies. They reduced trade withe European national and focused on the domestic issues. They saw the second world war as a European war and therefore took a neutral stance towards it.
Answer:
This equals 435
Explanation:
I know this because 3 times 3 = 9 times 3 = 27 times 3 = 81
Then 81 + 6 = 87 times 5 is 435
Different states may have different laws about what goods can be transported and who can use the water ways
Answer:
The Treaty of Versailles had significant negative economic impacts on Germany. Germany was required to pay the Allies $33 billion in reparations for the war damages caused by World War I. These payments made it very difficult for Germany to take actions that would help Germany's economy grow.
Explanation:
