Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Spoils system is a form of socio-political governmental practice in which the ruling party compensated its dedicated supporters and those that campaigned heavily for them with a political appointment or government jobs or positions.
Spoils system is considered a problem because it often leads to the employment of people in the government based on party nepotism rather than competency.
It leads to abuse of political power by the ruling party
It increases the acts of bribery and undue influence
It’s a trade barrier.
Because trade barriers restrict the trades for only certain international places, in this case it’s only To foreign nationals whom reside in India and such. Plus, the other options wouldn’t have made sense.
Answer:
A month after the Democratic conference, Senator Carter Glass of Virginia, a. Democratic leader who received 78 votes for the presidential nomination in 1924, reasserted in his speech of April 5 at Asheville that “prohibition is not a party issue.” The speech was of interest both for its comments on the candidacy of Governor Smith of New York and as a disclosure of the reasoning that prevailed in the Democratic conference.
“Prohibition was not passed by the Democrats or by the Republicans,” Senator Glass said, “but by men of both parties and with no regard for party lines. It was a moral issue, So why in heaven's name should the Democrats make the eighteenth amendment a party issue in the next national campaign, as though electing a wet President would affect the prohibition law? If they do they might just as well take the presidency to the Republicans on a silver platter…They might just as well take their party out and dump it on the scrap heap.”If the Democratic party nominated Governor Smith as “an avowed exponent of the movement to repeal or modify the eighteenth amendment” or should it make prohibition an issue by platform declaration, Senator Glass said, the Democratic candidate would be “badly beaten” and the party “irretrievably wrecked.” He explained at the same time that “the presidency means nothing in the fight for modification,” that the President could not change the Constitution, and that his influence with Congress on such an issue “would be negligible,” In view of these facts Senator Glass believed the modification issue had no place in a presidential platform or a presidential campaign.
Explanation:
Here is just some information to get you started. I copied this off the web, so you cannot use it as direct writing, because that would be copy-right.
I promise you this is not a scam, but the rest of the information or the website I got the information from is linked below.
https://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre1927042300
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Federalists advocated for strong central governments that united all of its states.
