1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
amm1812
3 years ago
11

Who kill selena quintanilla?

History
2 answers:
ziro4ka [17]3 years ago
7 0

Yolanda Saldivar.

Hope that helped!

gogolik [260]3 years ago
7 0
Yolanda Saldivar killed Selena quintanilla
You might be interested in
Which statement best completes this diagram?
timurjin [86]

Answer: A

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is a way that state governments have attempted to raise more revenue without adding a
babunello [35]

Answer:

Jamestown was the first settlement of the Virginia Colony, founded in 1607, and served as the capital of Virginia until 1699, when the seat of government was moved to Williamsburg. Wikipedia

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The battle of Hastings determined the language what which ruling class in the high Middle Ages?
VLD [36.1K]

Answer:

England

Explanation:

England fought in the Battle of Hastings against Normandy in 1066.

3 0
2 years ago
Why were the English settlers able to overcome the conflict and attacks with the Native Americans in New England?
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Shorten this and put it in your own words
pav-90 [236]

Answer:

Explanation:

Rome became a democracy about the year 133 BC. Later, the Romans ruled the world. Even the voting mechanism was rigged to give the votes of the rich more weight. When Augustus, the first emperor, died in 14 AD, public elections had all but vanished. This was a revolution, brought about by a century of civil conflict and, at times, outright combat. The important turning point, according to many Romans, was in the year 133 BC. The sequence of events is rather obvious. In the process, he removed another tribune who was opposed to the distribution and claimed that his reforms should be paid for with money from the newly established Roman imperial province of Asia. The land measure proposed by Gracchus was approved. Gracchus' motive is a little more hazy. Whatever his motivations, his work crystallized many of the basic concerns that would underpin revolutionary politics for the following century. Rome's expanding empire had far-reaching implications. Tiberius' plan to utilize Asia's income for land distribution was a bold declaration, implying that both the affluent and the poor should benefit from Rome's conquests. However, Tiberius' decision to run for a second tribunate prompted concerns about personal political power. This became an increasingly pressing issue as leaders in the first century BC, such as Julius Caesar, were occasionally given tremendous powers to cope with foreign military challenges to Rome, only to refuse to relinquish those powers when they returned to civilian life. Following the events of 133 BC, a succession of escalating crises ensued. Gaius Marius, a spectacularly successful soldier, vanquished adversaries in Africa, Gaul, and eventually Italy, when Rome's allies in Italy rose against her at the close of the century. He held the highest state post, the consulship, seven times, achieving an unprecedented level of long-term political domination. Marius subsequently clashed with Lucius Cornelius Sulla, another Roman warrior, who, following successes in the east, marched on Rome in 82 BC and declared himself 'dictator.' This was an ancient Roman post created to grant a powerful politician temporary powers in the event of an emergency. Sulla, unlike Julius Caesar, who would become dictator 40 years later, resigned from his position and died in his bed. Violence in the city, as well as fighting between gangs backing competing politicians and political programs, characterized the middle years of the first century BC. Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus (nicknamed 'Pompey the Great' after Alexander the Great) and Julius Caesar were the two main characters. Pompey enjoyed the backing of the traditionalists, while Caesar pushed radical measures in the style of Tiberius Gracchus. Historians in both the ancient and modern worlds have spent a lot of time trying to figure out how these two individuals ended up fighting in civil war. But the reality is that, given their respective levels of strength and ingrained rivalry, war was nearly unavoidable. There wasn't going to be much 'liberty' after that. Instead, another decade of civil war ensued, as Caesar's followers first fought his assassins, then fought amongst themselves when they were dispatched.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the power of Parliament increase between 1600 and 1700?
    11·1 answer
  • 6 billion years ago the earth is created from what
    5·1 answer
  • Which one of these nations was NOT a part of the Triple Alliance?
    15·2 answers
  • Most of highest mountains in Texas are found in which part of the state
    7·1 answer
  • Why is it an obligation or a duty for citizens to follow laws?
    15·1 answer
  • Which amendment in the Bill of Rights promises this liberty? The powers not delegated to the United States by constitution nor p
    5·1 answer
  • Why would we need to amend the U.S. Constitution
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following factors played the greatest role in creating the conditions Thomas Nast criticizes in the political carto
    15·1 answer
  • What does it mean for a country to be "born"
    13·1 answer
  • once your muscles and liver have stored all the glycogen possible, any excess glucose will be stored in the form of
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!