The given conjunction in this sentence is in. It is coordinating which is a corr.
<h3>
What do you understand by coordinating conjunctions?</h3>
In a compound sentence, coordinating conjunctions that link the independent clauses include the words "for," "however," "and," and "but." They function similarly to conjunctive adverbs like "for example," "however," or "hence," which denote the evolution of thoughts. For, and, nor, but, or, yet, and so are the seven coordinating conjunctions in English. Coordinating conjunctions exist in four different varieties: Cumulative or Copulative Conjunctions, Adversative Conjunctions, Disjunctive or Alternative Conjunctions, and Illative Conjunctions. For signifies causation: "We left a day early, for the weather was not as clement as we had hoped."
To learn more about Conjunction, visit:
brainly.com/question/11860695
#SPJ4
Third person limited point of view, is a method of storytelling in which the narrator knows only the thoughts and feelings of a single character, while other characters are presented only externally. Third person limited grants a writer more freedom than first person, but less knowledge than third person omniscient.
Answer:
Hi!
The answer to your question is option 3. The southern slaveholders claimed that the north benefited from slavery because they pointed out that the North’s textile industry depended on southern cotton.
Explanation:
As you may know, slaves in the south worked mainly on the cotton fields. Because harvesting cotton required a very large group of people, slaves were brought and the cotton industry skyrocketed. The south became rich for their cotton production and the north’s textile industry also benefited as they now had a bigger suppy of cotton to work with.
Because the industry was doing so well and people were making more money, the North defended slavery by showing how much the textile industry had benefited from the cotton harvested in the south by slaves. Since the textile industry depended entirely on the cotton harvested by slaves in the South, the North argued that the sudden end to the slave economy would a profound and killing economic impact since the cotton economy would collapse.
This a simile. This is because a simile uses like or as to compare two things. A metaphor doesn't use like or as, but it still compares things.
