1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rainbow [258]
3 years ago
13

Write a report analyzing the treaty agreement ending World War I

History
1 answer:
igomit [66]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

At the end of World War I, during a peace conference held in Paris, France, the victorious Allies concluded a series of peace treaties that would be imposed on the defeated Central Powers. The most important of these was the Treaty of Versailles, signed in June 1919 at the Palace of Versailles in Paris. The treaty, which codified peace terms between the Allies and Germany, held Germany responsible for starting the war, and imposed harsh penalties in terms of loss of territory, massive reparations payments and demilitarization.

Far from the “peace without victory” that U.S. President Woodrow Wilson had outlined in his famous Fourteen Points in early 1918, the Treaty of Versailles humiliated Germany while failing to resolve the underlying issues that had led to war in the first place. Economic distress and resentment of the treaty within Germany helped fuel the ultra-nationalist sentiment that led to the rise of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party, as well as the coming of a second World War just two decades later.

From the Fourteen Points to the Paris Peace Conference  

In a speech to Congress in January 1918, Wilson laid out his idealistic vision for the post-war world. In addition to specific territorial settlements based on an Entente victory, Wilson’s so-called Fourteen Points emphasized the need for national self-determination for Europe’s different ethnic populations. Wilson also proposed the founding of a “general association of nations” that would mediate international disputes and foster cooperation between different nations in the hopes of preventing war on such a large scale in the future.

When German leaders signed the armistice ending hostilities in World War I on November 11, 1918, they believed this vision articulated by Wilson would form the basis for any future peace treaty. This would not prove to be the case.

The Paris Peace Conference opened on January 18, 1919, a date that was significant in that it marked the anniversary of the coronation of German Emperor Wilhelm I, which took place in the Palace of Versailles at the end of the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. Prussian victory in that conflict had resulted in Germany’s unification and its seizure of Alsace and Lorraine provinces from France. In 1919, France and its prime minister, Georges Clemenceau, had not forgotten the humiliating loss, and intended to avenge it in the new peace agreement.  

The Terms of the Versailles Treaty

The “Big Four” leaders of the victorious Western nations—Wilson of the United States, David Lloyd George of Great Britain, Clemenceau of France and, to a lesser extent, Vittorio Orlando of Italy—dominated the peace negotiations in Paris. Germany and the other defeated powers, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and Turkey, were not represented at the conference; nor was Russia, which had fought as one of the Allied powers until 1917, when the country’s new Bolshevik government concluded a separate peace with Germany and withdrew from the conflict.

The Big Four themselves had competing objectives in Paris: Clemenceau’s main goal was to protect France from yet another attack by Germany, he sought heavy reparations from Germany as a way of limiting German economic recovery after the war and minimizing this possibility. Lloyd George, on the other hand, saw the rebuilding of Germany as a priority in order to reestablish the nation as a strong trading partner for Great Britain. For his part, Orlando wanted to expand Italy’s influence and shape it into a major power that could hold its own alongside the other great nations. Wilson opposed Italian territorial demands, as well as previously existing arrangements regarding territory between the other Allies; instead, he wanted to create a new world order along the lines of the Fourteen Points. The other leaders saw Wilson as too naive and idealistic, and his principles were difficult to translate into policy.

In the end, the European Allies imposed harsh peace terms on Germany, forcing the nation to surrender around 10 percent of its territory and all of its overseas possessions. The treaty also called for the demilitarization and occupation of the Rhineland, limited Germany’s army and navy, forbade it to maintain an air force, and required it to conduct war crimes trials against Kaiser Wilhelm II and other leaders for their aggression. Most importantly, Article 231 of the treaty, better known as the “war guilt clause,” forced Germany to accept full responsibility for starting World War I and pay enormous reparations for Allied war losses.

You might be interested in
What does the term “Final Solution” mean? How many Jews lost their lives during the Holocaust?
djverab [1.8K]
The final solution was the Nazis' answer to a problem that they didn't have. It consisted of demonizing and persecuting people they didn't like, and then working them, starving them, and killing them. Roughly six million Jews died during the Nazi Holocaust.
5 0
3 years ago
Why industrialization first occurred in europe?
a_sh-v [17]
The industrialization first occurred in Europe where European rulers fostered unusually close alliances with their merchant classes.
7 0
3 years ago
Although religious diversity has steadily increased throughout US history, the nation
vovikov84 [41]

Answer:

Explanation:

still struggles with religious intolerance.

7 0
3 years ago
Think of some Pros to mandatory Voting and some Cons to mandatory Voting.
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

Pros of Mandatory Voting

Mandatory Voting Would Increase Voter Turnout

Compulsory Voting Would Change Campaigning for the Better

Compulsory Voting Would Encourage Engagement in the Political Process

Compulsory Voting Would Discourage Voter Suppression

Cons of Mandatory Voting

Compulsory Voting Would Encourage an Uninformed Electorate

Compulsory Voting Would Hamper Freedom of Choice

It would be a burden to law enforcement

Compulsory Voting Could Infringe on Religious Rights

Explanation:

Mandatory voting requires some countries with eligible citizens to register and vote in elections. In the United States, voting is not mandatory; it is a freedom that citizens of the US have stated in the Constitution.

3 0
3 years ago
Under the Articles of Confederation, states had more power than the federal government. The US government…
forsale [732]
C . Is the correct answer
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why hadn’t Europeans used maritime routes before the age of exploration?
    13·2 answers
  • In the 1800s, many people in the North moved to ____​
    13·2 answers
  • Why was the Bible the only valid source of religious truth for Luther and other Protestants
    7·1 answer
  • According to the president’s speech, what were some effects of the financial crisis?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did Muslim people in the Middle East and other parts of Asia experience hardship during the time o the European Middle Ages
    13·1 answer
  • - Across
    7·2 answers
  • Please help out it’s so important
    12·1 answer
  • In which year did the United States land an astronaunt on the surface of the moon
    6·2 answers
  • Evaluate the following statement: Racism is the bedrock of the USA. How are the the forming of our nation's government and the p
    10·1 answer
  • 3. Write a brief paragraph describing the New Imperialism. Be sure to describe what it was, when it occurred, and what motivated
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!