1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rainbow [258]
3 years ago
13

Write a report analyzing the treaty agreement ending World War I

History
1 answer:
igomit [66]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

At the end of World War I, during a peace conference held in Paris, France, the victorious Allies concluded a series of peace treaties that would be imposed on the defeated Central Powers. The most important of these was the Treaty of Versailles, signed in June 1919 at the Palace of Versailles in Paris. The treaty, which codified peace terms between the Allies and Germany, held Germany responsible for starting the war, and imposed harsh penalties in terms of loss of territory, massive reparations payments and demilitarization.

Far from the “peace without victory” that U.S. President Woodrow Wilson had outlined in his famous Fourteen Points in early 1918, the Treaty of Versailles humiliated Germany while failing to resolve the underlying issues that had led to war in the first place. Economic distress and resentment of the treaty within Germany helped fuel the ultra-nationalist sentiment that led to the rise of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party, as well as the coming of a second World War just two decades later.

From the Fourteen Points to the Paris Peace Conference  

In a speech to Congress in January 1918, Wilson laid out his idealistic vision for the post-war world. In addition to specific territorial settlements based on an Entente victory, Wilson’s so-called Fourteen Points emphasized the need for national self-determination for Europe’s different ethnic populations. Wilson also proposed the founding of a “general association of nations” that would mediate international disputes and foster cooperation between different nations in the hopes of preventing war on such a large scale in the future.

When German leaders signed the armistice ending hostilities in World War I on November 11, 1918, they believed this vision articulated by Wilson would form the basis for any future peace treaty. This would not prove to be the case.

The Paris Peace Conference opened on January 18, 1919, a date that was significant in that it marked the anniversary of the coronation of German Emperor Wilhelm I, which took place in the Palace of Versailles at the end of the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. Prussian victory in that conflict had resulted in Germany’s unification and its seizure of Alsace and Lorraine provinces from France. In 1919, France and its prime minister, Georges Clemenceau, had not forgotten the humiliating loss, and intended to avenge it in the new peace agreement.  

The Terms of the Versailles Treaty

The “Big Four” leaders of the victorious Western nations—Wilson of the United States, David Lloyd George of Great Britain, Clemenceau of France and, to a lesser extent, Vittorio Orlando of Italy—dominated the peace negotiations in Paris. Germany and the other defeated powers, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and Turkey, were not represented at the conference; nor was Russia, which had fought as one of the Allied powers until 1917, when the country’s new Bolshevik government concluded a separate peace with Germany and withdrew from the conflict.

The Big Four themselves had competing objectives in Paris: Clemenceau’s main goal was to protect France from yet another attack by Germany, he sought heavy reparations from Germany as a way of limiting German economic recovery after the war and minimizing this possibility. Lloyd George, on the other hand, saw the rebuilding of Germany as a priority in order to reestablish the nation as a strong trading partner for Great Britain. For his part, Orlando wanted to expand Italy’s influence and shape it into a major power that could hold its own alongside the other great nations. Wilson opposed Italian territorial demands, as well as previously existing arrangements regarding territory between the other Allies; instead, he wanted to create a new world order along the lines of the Fourteen Points. The other leaders saw Wilson as too naive and idealistic, and his principles were difficult to translate into policy.

In the end, the European Allies imposed harsh peace terms on Germany, forcing the nation to surrender around 10 percent of its territory and all of its overseas possessions. The treaty also called for the demilitarization and occupation of the Rhineland, limited Germany’s army and navy, forbade it to maintain an air force, and required it to conduct war crimes trials against Kaiser Wilhelm II and other leaders for their aggression. Most importantly, Article 231 of the treaty, better known as the “war guilt clause,” forced Germany to accept full responsibility for starting World War I and pay enormous reparations for Allied war losses.

You might be interested in
What do the unitary, federal, and confederate forms of government have in common?
Daniel [21]

Answer: three things that these three governments have in common are:

- they all have effective governance

- they have a population

- they have territory

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Please help
Nezavi [6.7K]
The main way in which William Penn's treatment of Native American differed from the puritans' treatment was that "<span>D. penn *treated* native people with respect and paid a fair price for their land," since he let his Quaker beliefs guide his morals. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Why did the north so strongly resent the fugitive slave law, and why did the south resent northern resistance to enforcing it?
Slav-nsk [51]
The fugitive slave law was meant to return slaves, who had escaped to the "free" North, back to the South. It was a compromise set up by previous agreement made most recently in 1850. The 1850 agreement was an attempt to amend slave laws, but still allow for slavery in the South, while allowing the country to further expand to the West. The North resented the law, because it denied slaves the freedom embodied in the North. The South resented it, because they saw it as their right to own slaves per the 1850, regardless of where the slaves were in the U.S. The slaves were deemed extremely necessary because of the requirement of slave labor in the vast agricultural networks in the South.
6 0
3 years ago
Bella If you are reading this please reply Its Jordan
baherus [9]

Answer:

I was like woow what a love ❤ you are searching her anyways God is with you

5 0
3 years ago
How did the British transform India's economy
blagie [28]
The economy of India was transformed by the British in several ways, but perhaps the greatest way was that they transformed into a market economy with government oversight. 
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the processes behind sub-saharan africa’s political map, and why have there been relativelyfew boundary changes since t
    12·1 answer
  • Name 2 groups that had no rights under the declaration ?
    15·1 answer
  • Which place was the site of a victory for the continental army?
    15·2 answers
  • Suppose alexander had never defeated the persian. what might have been the consequences for the later development of the democra
    8·1 answer
  • According to this map, the Oregon territory A) was acquired from Britain. B) remained in foreign control. C) was purchased becau
    11·2 answers
  • Jacques Necker, the financial expert and advisor to Louis XVI, angered the First and Second Estates by proposing that ___.
    8·1 answer
  • Match the famous personalities to their contributations during the counterreformation
    5·1 answer
  • Which aspect of world culture is reflected by these quotations, all from the mid-1960s? "Our children are copying American cultu
    7·1 answer
  • Help me :(
    11·1 answer
  • Charles the first was the king of in 1625
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!