All categories

3 years ago

Why isn’t -3 a whole number? please answer asap

Mathematics

2 answers:

bulgar [2K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

-3 is not a whole number.

Whole number:

Starts from zero.
Doesn't include negative integers.
{0,1,2,3,4,5,6.....}

-3 is an integer, a negative integer.

Integer:

Subset of:
Negative integers
Zero
Natural number, Whole number(positive integers as a whole)

Hope this helps ;) ❤❤❤

Musya8 [376]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

-3 is not a whole number because the whole number is like a zero , no fraction or demical part and no negative

Hope this helps :)

Step-by-step explanation:

-3 has negative sign so it's not a whole number

You might be interested in

The length of a pole is to be 6.5ft. The actual length of the pole may vary by as much as 0.02ft. Write an absolute value inequa

Airida [17]

Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions here.

|x - 6.5| < 0.02 ft is the absolute value inequality for the possible lengths of the pole.

7 0

3 years ago

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT, IF WRONG NO BRAINLIEST Which statement accurately explains whether a reflection over the x-axis

Paladinen [302]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

No, A″C″B″ is located at A″(1, 1), C″(4, 3), and B″(1, 5)

Step-by-step explanation:

Line AB is horizontal, so reflection across the x-axis maps it to a horizontal line. Then rotation CCW by 90° maps it to a vertical line. The composition of transformations cannot map the figure to itself.

A reasonable explanation is the last one:

No, A″C″B″ is located at A″(1, 1), C″(4, 3), and B″(1, 5)

5 0

3 years ago

write the logarithm as a sum or difference of logarithms. simplify each term as much as possible. log4(6ab)

Dominik [7]

The logarithm written as a sum of logarithm and simplified as much as possible is $\frac{1}{2} +log_{4 }3 + log_{4 }a + log_{4 }b$

<h3>Simplifying Logarithms</h3>

From the question, we are to write the given logarithm expression as a sum or difference of logarithms

The given logarithm is

$log_{4 }6ab$

This can be written as

$log_{4 }6 \times a \times b$

From one of the rules of logarithm, we have that

$log_{x }yz= log_{x }y + log_{x }z$

Thus,

$log_{4 }6 \times a \times b$ becomes

$log_{4 }6 + log_{4 }a + log_{4 }b$

This can be further simplified into

$log_{4 }3 \times 2 + log_{4 }a + log_{4 }b$

$log_{4 }3 + log_{4 }2 + log_{4 }a + log_{4 }b$

If desired, this can be further simplified into

$log_{4 }3 + log_{2^{2} }2 + log_{4 }a + log_{4 }b$

$log_{4 }3 + \frac{1}{2} log_{2}2 + log_{4 }a + log_{4 }b$

$log_{4 }3 + \frac{1}{2} (1)+ log_{4 }a + log_{4 }b$

$\frac{1}{2} +log_{4 }3 + log_{4 }a + log_{4 }b$

Hence, the logarithm written as a sum of logarithm and simplified as much as possible is $\frac{1}{2} +log_{4 }3 + log_{4 }a + log_{4 }b$

Learn more on Simplifying logarithms here: brainly.com/question/17851187

#SPJ1

8 0

1 year ago

In the past, the average age of employees of a large corporation has been 40 years. Recently, the company has been hiring older

Viktor [21]

Answer:

$p_v =P(t_{(63)}>2.5)=0.0075$

If we compare the p value and the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to fail reject the null hypothesis, so we can conclude that the mean age is significantly higher than 45 years at 5% of significance.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

$\bar X=45$ represent the mean height for the sample

$s=16$ represent the sample standard deviation for the sample

$n=64$ sample size

$\mu_o =40$ represent the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.05$ represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.

t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)

State the null and alternative hypotheses.

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the mean age is higher than 40 years, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $\mu \leq 40$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu > 40$

If we analyze the size for the sample is < 30 and we don't know the population deviation so is better apply a t test to compare the actual mean to the reference value, and the statistic is given by:

$t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}$ (1)

t-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine if the mean is (higher, less or not equal) to an specified value".

Calculate the statistic

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:

$t=\frac{45-40}{\frac{16}{\sqrt{64}}}=2.5$

P-value

The first step is calculate the degrees of freedom, on this case:

$df=n-1=64-1=63$

Since is a one right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(t_{(63)}>2.5)=0.0075$

Conclusion

6 0

3 years ago

7 divided by 20 is what answers

Montano1993 [528]

Hello!

The Correct Answer to this is that 7 divided by 20 or 7/20 equals:

"7/20 = 0.35"

Explanation:

Since you are trying to find equivalent values for 7/20, you can make two proportions and set them equal to each other. The following states that "7 out of 20 is equal to some amount out of 100."

7/20=x/100

Solve by cross multiplying:

20x=700

Divide both sides by 20 to isolate x:

x=35 Therefore, 7/20=35/100. This is the same as saying 35%, since by definition "per" means out of, and "cent" means hundred. To make it into a decimal just move the decimal place two digits to the left, such that 35.00 becomes 0.35, and 100.00 becomes 1. Then it is simply 0.35/1, or 0.35

Hope this Helps! Have A Wonderful Day! :)

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers