Wiesel is in his home in Poland in the excerpt.
Incomplete question. Here's the options that completes the:
Explanation:
Take note of this expressions made by Judson in the text that shows he believes it is not a crime to punish a criminal himself:
1. “The law doesn’t call it murder if I shoot a thief who is entering my house by force,” he said harshly.
2. “..the law doesn’t punish burglary by death; so what right have you?” “When it comes to protecting my property, I make my own laws.”
I looked it up online and found the question related to this personal statement. It is the following:
Why does the writer need to revise the personal statement?
A. sentence 1 should include the writer’s first name.
B. sentence 2 should state what the essay prompt was.
C. sentence 3 should avoid mentioning money.
D. sentence 4 should avoid the extreme opinion.
Answer:
The reason why the writer needs to revise the personal statement is:
C. sentence 3 should avoid mentioning money.
Explanation:
<u>A personal statement is supposed to be a brief description of oneself in connection to the career one wishes to pursue. It should mention one's experience, education, and strengths in relation to that field. However, mentioning money should be avoided.</u> The personal statement is not the "place" to do so. Instead of sounding ambitious in a good way, talking about "good money" - as the writer did in the passage we are analyzing here - may make one sound shallow.
Among the two sentences given, the first sentence used the modifier correctly in order to clearly describe the words it is intended. The sentence, "I saw the car, that had passed us, screech to a halt at the red light." The modifier in this sentence is the phrase, "that had passed us". This phrase describes the word "car".
Answer:
Picture 1 shows relaxation after battle, while
Picture 2 shows an aspect of preparation.
Explanation:
I took the i-ready test.❤️
