1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mariarad [96]
3 years ago
12

FOLLOW MY SECOND ACCOUNT ZaraMin

English
1 answer:
Salsk061 [2.6K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

why should we follow you

You might be interested in
Reading Questions for "The Monkey's Paw" Directions: Record your answers on a separate piece of paper. Staple this page to the f
Olenka [21]

Answer:

qwert

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What is the adverb in this sentence, and what word does it modify?
harkovskaia [24]
The adverb is "now" and it modifies the word "on".
3 0
3 years ago
In O. Henry's "The Cactus,"
katen-ka-za [31]

Option B presents an excerpt capable of characterizing Trysdale.

<h3>Who is Trysdale?</h3>
  • He is the protagonist of "The Cactus."
  • He is a man who just got out of a relationship.
  • He is a man who is very reflective about the reasons that caused this relationship to end.

Option B represents Trysdale because it shows he is always thinking about why the relationship ended. This kind of thinking becomes a habit for him, where he always tries to understand what caused him to lose the woman he loved.

More information about what a protagonist character is at the link:

brainly.com/question/9091680

7 0
2 years ago
Which sentence from the passage best shows that the debate was a parliamentary debate? At yesterday’s debate, tensions were hi
damaskus [11]

The sentence from the passage that best shows that the debate was a parliamentary debate is:  The Taft team went second, making a strong counterclaim, but their argument didn't have as much supporting evidence.

A parliamentary debate is held in academic settings and it originated from the British Parliament. In a parliamentary debate their are two sides who have their own points and support them with evidence.

In the chosen option, we see that the Taft team had a counterclaim. Even though they were making an argument, they did not have a supporting evidence.

This shows that they were engaging in a parliamentary debate that they were not properly prepared for.

Learn more about parliamentary debates here:

brainly.com/question/1695492

7 0
2 years ago
Why do oligopolists usually collude?​
Nata [24]

Explanation:

when oligopolies usually collude they act as if they are one big firm thus trying to make bigger profits/ rising prices.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write a sentence about a collection a friend has accumulated
    12·2 answers
  • The watchman did not recognize the smoke as a new fire.
    6·2 answers
  • HELPPPP ASAPPP !!!!! Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the intelligence of machines. The term also refers to the developing
    14·1 answer
  • How long does a fire place last
    11·1 answer
  • What conflict does Gatsby face
    15·2 answers
  • Write your original thesis that makes a significant claim about the story.
    6·1 answer
  • have you ever read the outsiders and if you have imagine that you are S.E Hinton and you're writing a sequel to the outsiders. w
    7·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of the phrase "Slowly, heavily, the procession advanced toward the gate of
    6·1 answer
  • The author warns that video ads will. Students on the field. The ads will help the school , but he’s not sure it's worth it.
    9·1 answer
  • Review the first three paragraphs on page 3. Based on these paragraphs, which conclusion can readers draw about Eldred?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!