Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
The united states presidential election in california took place on november 6,2012. barack obama collected a total of 55 electoral votes. prior to the elections all 17 news organization considered that obama would win the election. thank you for this question. i hope that with my answer i was able to help you.
<span>Before 1860, the change that most influenced the lives of native americans on the great plains was the introduction of the horse. Reintroduction of the horses revolutionized entire cultures. It brought a lot of new possibilities of growth, so lots of tribes abandoned a relatively sedentary lifestyle in order to to become horse nomads. Also, the importance of haunting greatly increased for most tribes because ranges were expanded. As a result, a person’s wealth was measured in horses, those who could capture them from an enemy could be in respect with tribes.</span>
