1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lina2011 [118]
3 years ago
6

Describe the effectiveness of ISI and intifah as economic strategies for establishing Middle Eastern prosperity. How are these t

wo programs emblematic of the differing flaws in both controlled economies and capitalism?
History
1 answer:
Rom4ik [11]3 years ago
8 0
ISI (Inter-Service Intelligence) and Infitah are economic strategies that makes the economy of country high. With Infitah policy Egypt cut its alliance with USSR and was replaced by United States. While in ISI, Pakistans government was covered by an adversed national security. Also ISI was one of the top intelligence agency in 2011. These strategies can give a high economic rating.
You might be interested in
Which is of these is not an art form used by ancient Greeks
Mama L [17]

Answer:

painting

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Because the United States had gained control of Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines, Alfred T. Mahan supported what
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

OA - An expansion of the American navy

Explanation:

By arguing that sea power—the strength of a nation’s navy—was the key to strong foreign policy, Alfred Thayer Mahan shaped American military planning and helped prompt a worldwide naval race in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Mahan studied at Columbia for two years beginning in 1854—he was a member of the Philolexian Society, the campus literary club established in 1802—before decamping for Annapolis, from which he graduated in 1859. A longtime naval officer who cut his teeth on the Union side in the Civil War, Mahan eventually lectured on history and strategy at the Naval War College in Newport, R.I. It was there, inspired in part by a history of Rome, that he began developing his theories; in 1890 he turned his lecture notes into The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660-1783.

8 0
2 years ago
Where would negatively charged particles be most likely found in an atom?
Firlakuza [10]
"Outside the nucleus" is the one among the following choices given in the question that <span>negatively charged particles be most likely found in an atom. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the fourth option or option "D". I hope that the answer has come to your help. </span>
3 0
2 years ago
In what states would you find sultans, and how would sultans be the same or different from caliphs
Elden [556K]
A caliphate is the traditional form of government within Islam, arguably the only form of government permitted to exist according to Islamic law (sharīʿah). The term caliphate comes from the Arabic word khilāfa, meaning "succession" or "representation." Thus, a caliphate is an Islamic polity succeeding the Prophet Muhammad, with the caliph as the technical successor or representative. Historically, caliphs had both political and limited religious authority - they could establish what was already revealed in the Qur'an and the Sunnah, but could not have any form of religious revelation of their own. Within Sunni Islam, caliphs were therefore never viewed as religious figures; rather, they were understood to be the heads of state and the ultimate decider (for a time) on the legal ramifications of a Qur'anic verse or prophetic text, with the counsel of the most knowledgeable Muslims. With respect to Shi'i Islam, the only historically recognized Shi'i caliphate to have existed is the Fatimid caliphate; the Fatimid dynasty differed from typical Sunni caliphates in that the caliph was viewed by fellow Isma'ili Shi'is as having a unique understanding of the secret meanings of the Qur'an. But as a whole, caliphs were originally seen as having authority in all political/military/legal affairs, and only some religious affairs.

A sultunate is a form of government with a sultan as a political and military leader; it is essentially equivalent to an emirate (there is no real difference between these terms). The term sultan was first used as a title of authority by Mahmud of Ghazni in 1002. He declared himself Sultan of Ghazna, yet still maintained his allegiance to the Abbasid caliph. The 9th century witness the fragmentation of the Abbasid caliphate and the rise of multiple sultunates and emirates, yet these sultans/emirs always proclaimed their allegiance to the caliph, since the caliphate continued to be viewed as a religious obligation. Sultans only had power with regard to political and military matters - religious/legal authority was eventually acquired by Islamic scholars. So after the 9th century, the "caliphate" was viewed as an umbrella of multiple polities with sultans and scholars at the center of power. This changed once the Ottoman sultans defeated the Mamluks in 1517 and assumed the title of caliph - after this point, the title of sultan was "joined" with the title of caliph.
7 0
3 years ago
What did Thomas Jefferson say in regards to the French potentially controlling New Orleans
cupoosta [38]

When Jefferson became president, peace was pending in Europe and he could look forward to disentangling the nation from the vices and alliances of foreign politics. "Peace is my passion," he repeatedly affirmed. Yet he was no pacifist. One of his first executive acts was to send a naval squadron to the Mediterranean to enforce peace without tribute on the piratical Barbary states. The Tripolitan War, as it was called, met with partial success: a treaty with Tripoli in 1805.

Far more important, of course, was the burgeoning crisis on the Mississippi, which would end in the triumph of the Louisiana Purchase. By the secret Treaty of San Ildefonso in October 1800, as Jefferson learned six months later, Spain ceded the great province of Louisiana (Jefferson suspected the Floridas as well) to France, conditional on an Italian throne for the duke of Parma, Charles IV's brother-in-law. The retrocession of Louisiana, which France had lost in 1763, announced the revival under Napoleonic auspices of old French dreams of empire in the New World. Over the years the United States had worked out an accommodation with Spain on the Mississippi. The Pinckney Treaty (or Treaty of San Lorenzo) of 1795 granted the Americans free navigation of the river through Spanish territory to the mouth, together with the privilege of deposit and reshipment of goods at New Orleans. This was an enormous, indeed essential, boon to western development. American trade at New Orleans dwarfed that of the Spanish.

Spain was a weak and declining power, and given the pace of American expansion across the continent, Jefferson confidently expected that the river, the Floridas, and Louisiana would all fall to the Americans in due time. But Louisiana in the hands of France was another matter. In Napoleon's grand design, Louisiana and the Floridas would provide the necessary economic and strategic support for an overseas empire centered on St. Domingue (Hispaniola), the richest of the French colonies, then in the control of rebel blacks led by Toussaint L'Ouverture. The reconquest of the island was therefore the first step toward realizing the design. This would not be short work, as Jefferson recognized.

Considering all the difficulties and imponderables of Napoleon's plan, the president made as little noise as possible, kept his patience, and put Louisiana in the track of diplomacy. His strategy was one of delay and maneuver improvised to meet events as they unfolded. His first and minimal concern was to ensure that if France did actually come into power at New Orleans, Americans in the West would be accorded the same commercial rights and privileges as under the Spanish. In Washington the secretary of state constantly drummed into the French envoy the grave danger to his country of making enemies of the American people on the Mississippi issue; and the envoy, Louis Pichon, transmitted these perturbations to Paris. In Paris the American minister, Robert R. Livingston, composed a memoir setting forth in detail the great American interest in Louisiana and the Floridas. He was unheeded and unheard, however. "There never was a government in which less could be done by negotiation than here," he wrote home. "There is no people, no Legislature, no councillors—One man is everything."

In April 1802, Jefferson decided it was time to strike out on a bold new course. Through the good offices of a mutual friend, Pierre-Samuel du Pont de Nemours, who was returning to France, Jefferson gave stern warning to Napoleon:


There is on the globe one single spot, the possessor of which is our natural and habitual enemy. It is New Orleans, through which the produce of three-eighths of our territory must pass to market, and from its fertility it will ere long yield more than half of our whole produce, and contain more than half our inhabitants.. . . The day that France takes possession of New Orleans fixes the sentence which is to restrain her forever within her low water mark. It seals the union of two nations who in conjunction can maintain exclusive possession of the ocean. From that moment we must marry ourselves to the British fleet and nation.

<span>

Read more: <span>http://www.presidentprofiles.com/Washington-Johnson/Thomas-Jefferson-Louisiana-purchase.html#ixzz4cp...</span></span>

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The current U.S government is an example of?
    5·1 answer
  • Describe the economies of the North and South during the early 1800s
    10·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the United States' Cold War policy of containment?
    13·1 answer
  • What was a muckraker
    11·2 answers
  • What was the main purpose of one of the first world organizations, the League of Nations?
    13·1 answer
  • Which type of historical evidence is a newspaper article written immediately after the Great Chicago Fire?
    10·2 answers
  • The rivers in _____ run from west to east.
    8·1 answer
  • The United States has a free trade agreement with:
    7·1 answer
  • The most important function of political parties is *
    14·2 answers
  • Why do you think that President Obama said what he did about Lincoln making his own story possible?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!