Answer:
Database Marketing
Explanation:
According to my research on the different marketing methods, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the best communication method for achieving her goals would be Database Marketing. This is because this type of marketing technique uses databases to choose the right individual market segments and delivering their marketing message through those channels with the people that are already part of those market segments.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: False
Explanation:
The contract is such that Molly agreed to bring bracelets if Jean would pay for said bracelets.
The terms of the contract therefore are that Jean would pay and Molly would deliver. Jean then calls Molly and says that they will be unable to pay which means that they are not going to be able to hold up their responsibilities in the contract.
Molly has the right to then cancel the contract because the other party will not be able to perform their obligations and face no repercussion for it.
Answer:
$8750.87
Explanation:
This is compound interest problem. The formula used to solve this would be:
Where
F is the future value (what we want, after 3 years)
P is the initial value (given 6900)
r is the rate of interest per period
here, 8% per year, so 8/4 = 2% per period (since compounded per quarter)
t is the time (3 years and compounding per year so times of compounding is 3*4 = 12), so t = 12
Substituting, we get our answer:
<u>There will be about $8750.87 at the account at the end of 3 years!</u>
Answer:
There are no options listed, but what I can tell you for sure is that John's actions were both unethical and illegal.
What John did is unethical because it is not moral and it goes against all the principles that guide professional conduct. John also did something illegal because he was an accomplice in committing fraud against the company. He knowingly benefited from the accountant's illegal actions, and that is basically the legal definition of an accomplice to a crime.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: the company's present business offer attractive growth opportunities and can be counted on to create economic value for shareholders.
Explanation:
To begin with, the fact that a company faces the dilemma between continue with the current business lineup or change it in order to begin producing a new one by starting from zero then a lot of variables must be taken care of and considered, that is, that at the moment of making the final decision the managers must understand the opportunity costs that can affect the organization and moreover the benefits that the actual lineup makes. That is why, that at the time of sticking with the current business lineup it makes sense to continue with the current one when the company's present business offer attractive growth opportunities and can be counted on to create economic value for shareholders.
