resources of the Prairies were sent to Eastern Canada which sells them to the world for large profits
A "rational" use would mean a compromise between different interest and would also take into account scientific knowledge. Therefore neither a complete ban or unconditional permission on lumbering are rational.
A correct answer is
D. National forests should be protected to make the best use of the nation's natural resources.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "The program called for increased government spending." one reason some people supported supply-side economics and others opposed it is that <span>The program called for increased government spending.</span>
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that "iron rails were easily replaceable", since in fact that represented relatively permanent infrastructure. </span></span>
Socialists were in many ways looking for a radical change in the way society was structured. Their main goal was to re-build economic, political, philosophical and religious systems from scratch, neglecting everything related to the capitalist society they wanted to overcome. Because of this idea of re-installation, of decosntruction of all known models, socialists were utopian in their way of thinking and developing.
Social reformers on the other hand, understood the principles of socialist and communist societies but also the fact that their idea of democracy required winning state power. By slowly adapting the established system to their social reforms they could remain in power for long periods of time that could then be used to further transform and fix the issues presented by capitalism like lack of education, low wages and inequity.
