In political systems that allow and protect this right, the system is able to be altered by the people if they think that it should be. This means that if they disagree with something, they are able to petition it without being harassed or arrested. This can change the political system if the system gets to where the people don’t have rights and they will try and change that.
Answer:
can't remeber, though i have learned about them.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can comment on the following things.
The difference between Jefferson's and Henry's evidence of reaction to the colonists' petitions was that Thomas Jefferson decided to draft part of the "Olive Branch Petition" of July 1775, in which American Colonists asked for the support of English King George III to help the colonists and their conditions.
Jefferson's language in the petition was deemed a little bit aggressive, and the draft was edited by John Dickinson, from Pennsylvania.
In the case of Patrick Henry, he was direct and became so famous by his quote of "Gimme liberty or gimme death!"
In both cases, the rhetorical appeal of these speeches relied on Pathos, the rhetorical device that appeals to emotion to convince the audience.
Hammurabi's Code set laws in the Babylonian empire that applied to everyone. Including Hammurabi himself. This was important because it had never been done before, at least not at such a bit level. Hammurabi's Code inspired many countries to do the same, which led to monarchs being less powerful and was another step in the direction of democracy.
Hope this helps! Please let me know if I'm wrong :)
