No one, not even he could have averted the war without a historical wrong that could no longer be justified in a democracy - the continuation of legal human bondage in the United States. But to answer the question. Yes, I think it was very possible that no guns had to fire, and it would have been to me a revolting development.
The answer for this question is c
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The war techinaclly never ended, they just made a promise to one another to stop shooting for a few years.
I don't get it, is this a question or an answer? either way it's correct because during that time the Egyptian Empire was still very much active, but I can't recall them spreading to the Middle East
Ive had this question before!
Following the Pullman strike, efforts by employers to obtain anti-union court orders were generally successful because there were no legal protections for unions.
