The correct answer is C. Assembly line jobs.
Assembly line jobs were rather useful because they created many job opportunities. An example would be in shoe-making. Whereas you once had a single person do everything all by himself, which would consume time and money, now you had an assembly line that would employ different people for different activities and thus increasing the production and employment.
The emperor was given the power to veto the pope’s appointment of bishops.
Henry V was recognized by the church as the lawful emperor.
The emperor recognized the church’s authority to appoint bishops.
The Intolerable Acts were the American Patriots' term for a series of punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party. They were meant to punish the Massachusetts colonists for their defiance of throwing a large tea shipment into Boston Harbor in reaction to being taxed by the British. In Great Britain, these laws were referred to as the Coercive Acts.
The acts took away Massachusetts' self-government and historic rights, triggering outrage and resistance in the Thirteen Colonies. They were key developments in the outbreak of the American Revolution in 1775.
Answer:
The ONE major difference between Wood’s and Bailyn’s historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelled against the British is:
According to Wood, the American colonies rebelled and revolted out of reasoned principle. They had the mindset that they were "born heirs of freedom" and that freedom is their everyday life. While, according to Bailyn, the colonies rebelled and revolted due to the rise of conspirators who stood against their freedom.
Explanation:
Wood's and Bailey's historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelled against the British can be seen from the excerpt. It's evident that their interpretations differ.
Wood revealed that the Americans didn't rebel due to suffering but due to a "reasoned principle". Whereas, Bailey interpreted it to be that the conspirators against the liberty propelled the revolt.
Answer:
the union
Explanation:
As governor of Texas, Sam Houston steadfastly led the state to be loyal to the Union. However, in the end, Texas ended up siding with the South and seceding.
