Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
Answer:
The right to bear arms ( the 2nd admendment ) means that by no mater what the government cannot take away our weapons, we have the right to protect our selves using guns
Explanation:
does not apply with criminals
The answer is:
They each plead with Caesar, asking for a pardon for Publius Cimber.
f tWritten in 1599 by Shakespeare the Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a dramatic play about the assasination of Julius Caesar and how Brutus eventually betrays him and helps in his assasination.
Yes the American government has to be condemned for the way that they took the lands of the Indians.
<h3>Why the Americans took Indian lands</h3>
The Americans due to the need for Westward expansion felt that they were in a place that was their birthright.
They felt that they should be the owners because God has given them the areas. Hence they pushed the original land owners away from their properties.
Read more on Westward expansion here:
brainly.com/question/245803
#SPJ1
