This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
Diffrent places they had to go or diffrent pubs
Answer:
Sharecropping
Explanation:
This was a form of agriculture where people were allowed to use the landowners land in exchange for sharing crops.
Answer:
Japan became industrialized later than Great Britain, but earlier than the rest of Asia.
Explanation:
Japan is considered to be an “early late-developing nation” owing to the fact that Japan attained its period of industrialization only in the 19th century, though quite early than most other Asian countries but later than Great Britain and other European and Western Countries who have since attained their industrialized state since the 18th Century. During Japan's industrialization process and development, Japan borrowed heavily from the Western experiences with industrialization owing to the fact that Japan was behind them by a number of years.
Japan actively borrowed from the West throughout its development.
Job Opportunities, free public education wasn’t really a motivating factor, neither was nativism
