The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you do not specify a specific topic to develop the argument. An argument about what?
What is your compelling question? We cannot cite evidence of your research because you did not mention what is the topic of your research.
If we can help with something, we are going to set our own example based on our own topic.
How about the following.
Compelling question:
Was the Revolutionary War the last option for Patriots to get Independence from Great Britain?
Argument/Evidence:
1.- Yes, it was the only option after the number of aggressions and aggravations from the British crown. The English government never had the "openness" to negotiate another valid solution.
2.- Colonists were sick and tired of the heavy taxation imposed by the English government. We are talking about injust taxation such as the Navigation Acts, the Stamp Act, the Townshend Act, or the Tea Act.
3.- The worst part of it was that colonists had to pay those taxations but they did not have a voice in the British Parliament.
Explanation:
It is a social experiment and is the first country to establish a government based on self rule and the rights of man. In the Age of Enlightenment in the 18th century a government of the people, by the people, and for the people was a novel idea that was borne out of the idea that the right of man come from a higher power and not from being given to them by another person. No other country in the history of the world had crafted a governing system built on these precepts. Ii was assumed that it would fail, that people did not have the ability to govern themselves without someone to oversee and have the last word.
A muckraker is a journalist who devotes their work to uncovering topics that might be overlooked or ignored by the powers that be. That said, a muckraker is D a writer who exposes unsafe working conditions.
Answer: the treaty of non-aggression
Explanation:
