The argument that James is making in this speech kings are god’s representatives on earth and should not be challenged. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the argument?</h3>
Generally, the argument is simply defined as a hot or furious discourse of opposing or divergent viewpoints.
In conclusion, In this lecture, James argues that monarchs are god's ambassadors on Earth and should not be disputed.
Read more about the argument
brainly.com/question/9860191
#SPJ1
The back country was also called the frontier.
It was the area beyond the
settled land. In the early 1700s, it was the
land between the <span>Atlantic coastal region
</span> and the Appalachian Mountains.
Answer:
The feudal system was a way of orginizing people
Explanation:
The king having the high rank had everything so he gave the land to the barrons so for that the barrons provided him with knights and money. The barrons gave land to the knights and the knights gave the barrons protection and militery service. The peasents being at the bottom had no choice they got land from the knights and gave them food and services when demanded they got no choice and all. Hope this makes sense
<span>Adams-Onis treaty is the your answer</span>
Answer:
Climate may never be the same again.
Explanation:
There was no context given with the question,but I hope this works.