Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

11

Most of the stock price response to a corporate earnings or dividend announcement occurs within ________________.A. about 30 sec

ondsB. about 10 minutesC. 6 monthsD. 2 years

1 answer:

7nadin3 [17]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

C. 6 months.

Explanation:

As most of the corporate earning are reflected during the quarterly periods of the company tenures the earnings are reflected in the announcement of the fiscal years.

It takes about 6 months for the dividend to be announced on the corporate earnings. The earnings reflect the demands of the company money markets. However, as the number of stocks earnings increases the shares of the outstanding shares.

Thus the stock prices respond to the changing corporate earnings.

You might be interested in

Manta Ray Company manufactures diving masks with a variable cost of $25. The masks sell for $34. Budgeted fixed manufacturing ov

Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

(First Case) Absorption cost income is higher by 14,200 dollars

(Second Case) variable costing income is higher by 44,000 dollars

(Third Case) they are equal as produciton = sales

Explanation:

the difference arises when production differs with sales.

that's because variable will consider the entire amount of fixed cost as cost of the period while, absorption will capitalizethe fixed cost through inventory. If production matches sales then in both cases the fixed cost are entire expressed in the income statement. If they don't the difference is the difference times unit fixed cost.

(First Case)

fixed cost per unit $792,000 / 110,000 = $7.2

difference (110,000 - 108,000) x $7.2 = $14,200

(Second Case)

fixed cost per unit: 792,000 / 110,000 = $8.8

difference (90,000 - 95,000) x $8.8 = $44,000

(Third Case)

They match thus, no difference arises.

6 0

3 years ago

: During June of 1997: Steve Wall, the Advanced Projects Design Team Leader at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, estimated that

slava [35]

Answer:

This is really a personal opinion, since whether it is correct to send people to mars or not depends largely on your point of view and personal beliefs. Clearly, humans are far more capable than robots, and they can explore space and eventually other planets much better than a rover. On the other hand, sending people to Mars is not only extremely expensive, but it is also extremely dangerous for the astronauts themselves.

Imagine so many people died trying to get to space and then to the moon, and that was very easy compared to getting to Mars and back.

We can find millions of better ways to use the money than sending people to space, and that is really hard to argue against. Our planet, our country, state or even city could all benefit and use the money more productively.

But lets say that we do not care about the money because Mr. Bezos or some other billionaire decided to donate it. Now we would face the technical issues of going to Mars and actually staying there for a long time. A trip to mars is not something that would be carried out for just a couple of hours (like moon walking). Astronauts will have to stay in Mars for weeks, months or even years before they can return. This results in an extreme danger to their health due to cosmic rays. Can humans survive long term exposure to cosmic rays? The answer is NO and Mars's atmosphere doesn't help.

If we analyze this situation from a technical point of view, it would be better and safer to send astronauts to Titan (Saturn's moon), and would probably be also more useful. Titan's environment is similar to Earth's in many ways, and if we are actually doing it for a scientific purpose besides simply being curious, then it is much more useful to go to Titan. The scientific purpose of going to mars instead of other possible destinations is not very solid. Mars is really different to Earth and unless someone finds Martians living there, there is not much you can do.

8 0

3 years ago

The Sand Cruiser is a takeout food store at a popular beachside resort. Teresa Texton, owner of the Sand Cruiser, was deciding h

Vanyuwa [196]

Answer: $6.2

Explanation: Contribution margin is the amount of revenue left after paying for the variable cost, it can be formulated as follows :-

contribution = sales - variable cost

In case of Limeade:-

sale price = $22.10

Variable cost = $15.90

so, putting the values into equation we get :-

contribution per foot = $22.10 - $15.9 = $6.2

5 0

3 years ago

Simpkin Corporation owns manufacturing facilities in States A, B, and C. B uses a three- factor apportionment formula under whic

ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

Simpkin Corporation

Simpkin's apportionable income assigned to B is:________.

b. $533,333

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Apportionable operating income = $1,000,000

State A State B State C Totals

Sales $400,000 $800,000 $300,000 $1,500,000

Payroll 100,000 150,000 50,000 300,000

Property 200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000

State B's portion of the operating income = $1,000,000 * $800,000/$1,500

= $533,333

5 0

3 years ago

Mike and Tom debone chicken breasts for Ted's Chicken Co. Mike is new and can only debone 30 chicken breasts per hour, while Tom

vodka [1.7K]

Answer:

Their average hourly productivity as a team for chicken breasts will be

45.

Explanation:

Here, it is given that Mike and Tom debone chicken breasts for Ted' chicken company.

Mike debones 30 chicken breasts,

Meanwhile Tom is having his own experience in this work and knows how to calculate the hourly work

So, Tom allows Mike to debone only 60 chicken breasts per hour.

Now its mentioned that both Tom and Mike had worked 40hrs per week.

So, their average hourly productivity as a team will be:

$frac\ {{30} +{60}} {2}$

⇒ 45

So, their average hourly productivity as a team for chicken breasts will be 45.

7 0

3 years ago