1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astraxan [27]
3 years ago
9

Why the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact was such a surprise to the world.

History
1 answer:
zhuklara [117]3 years ago
5 0
The <span>Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact was such a surprise to the world because these two nations (Germany and Russia) had long been ideological enemies, due mostly to the fact that Hitler abhorred communism. </span><span />
You might be interested in
How did the failure of the League of Nations to prevent World War II affect the formation of the United Nations
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

The US, the UK, the USSR, and China had not belonged to the League of Nations, and therefore had no interest in the United Nations.

Explanation:

Hope this helped =)

5 0
2 years ago
Help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bulgar [2K]
I think b and d ( the second and last) are good but idk
7 0
2 years ago
Which statement best reflects Patriots feelings during the revolutionary war?
sleet_krkn [62]
The answer is D. The colonies have the right to separate from Great Britain. They felt that they were being treated unfairly under British rule. Hope this helps! :)
8 0
3 years ago
By the 1970s how much of the world's population lived under communist regimes
BabaBlast [244]
One-third of the world's population lived under communist governments at that time.

The largest communist nations were the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) and the People's Republic of China.  Nations in Eastern Europe were under communism and Soviet influence, behind what Winston Churchill called the "Iron Curtain."  Communism had also spread elsewhere around the globe, in places like Cuba and Vietnam.
3 0
3 years ago
PLZZ HELP ASAP (60PTS!!)
Marat540 [252]

<u>Question 1.  </u>

Yes, Justice Murphy conceded that there were some people within the United States who acted with disloyalty toward the United States.  In this case, the issue had to do with Japanese Americans on the West Coast. But in his Dissenting Opinion, Justin Murphy argued that the fact of disloyalty by some should not mean that all Americans of Japanese ancestry be subjected to restriction of their rights and evacuation orders.  As he wrote, "Under our system of law individual guilt is the sole basis for deprivation of rights."  Treating all Japanese Americans as if they were guilty of disloyalty to the United States was a violation of their constitutional rights and was a "legalization of racism," as Justice Murphy put it.  All citizens of the United States must be treated "at all times as the heirs of the American experiment and as entitled to all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution."  

<u>Question 2.</u>

I do agree with the Minority Opinion that racial prejudice played a role in the US government's treatment of Japanese Americans.  The military was allowed to act outside of proper constitutional limits and infringed on the rights of citizens.  There was definitely prejudice, which means pre-judging or judging in advance.  The authorities were able to force any and all persons of Japanese ancestry into internment camps, without presenting any evidence that they as individuals had, in fact, done anything to warrant such action against them.  It had been generic, stereotyped suspicion of anyone of Japanese heritage that prompted the government to restrict the civil liberties of Japanese Americans.  President Roosevelt's Executive Order 9066 (February 1942), which allowed the Secretary of War to designate certain areas as military zones, set the stage for the mass relocation of Japanese-ancestry persons to internment camps.  By June of 1942, over 100,000 Japanese Americans were sent to such internment camps.  That was a rush to judgement against thousands of persons without due process of law, to which they were entitled under the US Constitution.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes the French and Indian War?
    15·1 answer
  • 37. Soviet missiles were threatening America through which neighboring nation?
    15·1 answer
  • How did labor forces change in countries affected by the Industrial Revolution?
    5·2 answers
  • What led to the downfall of both the Inca and Aztec empires?
    15·1 answer
  • how were the new immigrants that arrived in America in the late eighteen hundreds different from earlier waves of immigrants
    13·1 answer
  • Cromwell’s rule could best be described as a
    6·2 answers
  • Who was allowed to issue paper money during the 1800s
    9·1 answer
  • According to the Preamble, where does the power for<br> government come from?
    7·1 answer
  • In the late 1800's ladies were given a red rose at a fashionable Louisville Derby party, resulting in the flower’s adoption as p
    11·2 answers
  • Why did Rhode Island become a haven for people of various religious faiths?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!