Answer:
Depends on what people think this is an opinionated question but here is what I thinks:
Explanation:
Not very often; as of 2020 with the murder of George Floyd people are way more decisive on police officers and how they do there job. This does not happen often. Up to many times of people saying corruption and police brutality there has been proof of someone handeling a gun, not co-operating, or being a threat. Im not saying it does ot happen but we need to look deeper than what we see and think.
Answer:
c. $37,200
Explanation:
I suppose this is the complete question:
You must chooce one of the amounts below.
Frank legally divorced his wife last year. His ex-wife has joint ownership of their home and sole custody of their two children. As part of the divorce decree (dated June 1, 2018), Frank was ordered to continue to pay the full mortgage payments as well as cash payments to his ex-wife. Frank was also ordered to pay child support for the children. Frank pays the following amounts: • Alimony in the amount of $1,300 cash per month • Mortgage payments in the amount of $1,800 per month • Child support in the amount of $800 per month How much can Frank deduct as alimony? Select one: a. $26,400 b. $46,800 c. $37,200 d. $36,000?
Answer:
Put her on probation and some therapy
Explanation:
Hopefully the probation will make her think about what she has done and the therapy with help with whatever she needs to get out
Answer:
Double Jeopardy right
Explanation:
This clause has it that is prohibited for a person to be convicted for the same crime more than once. This is a fifth amendment clause that was developed following the palko v Connecticut case. Palko had being charged for first degree murder but he got second degree sentence. The state of Connecticut filed an appeal against him and won the appeal. He was therefore sentenced to death
Answer:
Binding precedent relies on the legal principle of stare decisis.
Explanation:
Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case.
Stare decisis means to stand by things decided. It ensures certainty and consistency in the application of law.
