Answer:
Under both statutes.
Explanation:
The meeting shown in the question above managed to violate two statutes, according to the statute developed to combat organized crime, in addition to violating the study that prohibits interstate drug transport. In that case, the convict must be tried for two infractions in different statutes and if convicted he must be convicted based on the guidelines of the two statutes.
Evidence is proof of a claim. An example of evidence would be a knife with fingerprints at a crime scene.
Please mark brainliest if helpful! :))
A Explanation: Trust Me Bro
